Welcome to the Net Muslims Forums.
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default France Shooting Exposed as False Flag

    Charlie Hebdo Paris Attack Was Inside Job, False Flag? Conspiracy Theories Go Viral Online


    The headquarters of the satirical French newspaper Charlie Hebdo was attacked by three gunmen on Wednesday with automatic rifles killing 12 people including two police officers.

    Police have identified the three gunmen who massacred journalists at the magazine office. The youngest of the three – Hamyd Mourad, 18, surrendered to the police on Wednesday. The two others are reported to be brothers named Said Koucahi and Cherif Kouachi.

    Although suspicion has fallen on the ISIS group because the attack seemed to be in reaction to the magazine's tweet about leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, there are other reports that suggest al-Qaeda could be responsible.

    However, since no group has come forward to take responsibility for the attack, conspiracy theories are abounding online, one even saying that the attack was an inside job.

    Here is a look at two conspiracy theories that have come up so far:

    It was an Inside Job

    Online forums are abuzz with the theory that the timing of the attack was so precisely worked out that the assault could not have been a random one. The masked gunmen seemed to know when exactly to attack the newspaper headquarters and it targeted two high-profile marks – the world's highest paid cartoonists: Stephane Charbonnier aka 'Charb' and editor Jean Cabut aka "Cabu".

    "What is interesting is that the newspaper that was attacked had press day that day and all of the important staff were there. So I would say that this was an assassination. These two guys handled the situation like real professionals," a Reddit member 'Club-mate said on a thread discussing possible theories.

    The gunman seemed to know that the paper had a press day on Wednesday and all journalists would be in attendance. How did they get that information? Was someone within the organisation involved?

    Also interesting is the fact that the whole attack was over within minutes. It looked as if they knew whom to shoot and run away.

    Reports suggest that just within five minutes they entered the building, shot a bunch of people before fleeing.

    "Definitely a hit squad but not with the intention of revenge or retaliation for some cartoon," said another reddit member.

    Was it a False Flag?

    Lack of clarity on who was exactly responsible for the attack, backed by the fact that the gunmen seemed to be staging a "practised attack" has given rise to another theory that it was just a false flag.

    This comes at a time when anti-Islamic movements are growing in Europe, especially in neighbouring Germany where thousands are taking to the streets to protest against the "Islamisation" of Europe.

    There are speculations that the gunmen were reacting to a comic strip depicting ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi. However, the timing is suspicious, as the shooters seemed to be reacting to a cartoon that was posted 1 hour before the shooting. There was not enough time for the shooters to react to the comic strip and plan and execute the attack.

    There are indications of military preparation, posture, and movement in the whole attack, one redditor notes adding that it seems a practised attack. Also that the fact that there are no cars driving by in Paris on a working day raises questions, Heavy.com notes.


    Paris Shooting Attack - False Flag No Blood (Shouts 'Allahu Akbar') - ISIS Scaremongering

    Paris Shooting Attack is a False Flag

    The Paris shooting is a False Flag. Here some points to consider:

    ♦ The cop on the street shot multiple times, but no blood

    ♦ Killers speak fluent French but has trouble saying "Allahu Akbar"

    ♦ Killer is worried about littering, picks up something and casually walks to the car

    ♦ Killers only kill the supposed cartoonists and editor, but no one else in the building

    ♦ The Muslims named as suspected have their classmates give testimony that they were in class at the time of the shooting.

    It's another false flag to villainize Islam and the Muslims, and to kill more Muslims.


    Paris attack is false flag

    An article with references to show that the magazine reported against the Islamophobes (Extremist Christian politicians) on the same day it was attacked. This plan was in the works for some time now.



    Their false story is already starting to fall apart before gaining momentum.

    Now they are raising the point about Free Speech with these cartoons and telling Muslims to shut-up and accept it. It was the same magazine that posted one comment about Sarkozy and they cartoonist was fired for being an anti-Semite and faced hate charges in the court.

    Paris Charlie Hebdo attack has at least 3 NATO Operation Gladio signatures

    These attackers most likely European trained fascist Gladio soldiers or French speaking, NATO trained, ISIS types

    1. As the Daily Telegraph put it: “The attackers displayed a degree of skill and calmness that comes only from advanced military training.”


    2. Then there’s the political aspect here with much of the sensible French military and political class who are against French involvement in NATO operations against ISIS in Syria and the countering of the Russian Black Sea Fleet in the Eastern Mediterranean. Effectively joining in a war that could turn nuclear


    The French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle and its fleet will be deployed to the Gulf to support operations against the Islamic State (ISIS), Mer et Marine news site reported yesterday.

    3. Finally the political shock effect of killing police officers. Armed anti-terror police were notable by their absence. Instead poor unarmed gendarmes were sent to tackle the gunmen.

    As happened in Vielsalm in Belgium in the successful attempt to stop the Belgian government voting to remove US cruise missiles from Belgium. Most of the police service, as in the Gladio attacks on Belgian police, don’t understand the way these special ops work: Secretly signed off at the highest levels of National intelligence services and Prime Ministers. Then coordinated through ‘private’ networks of private military companies like Blackwater/XE and retired intelligence officers such as the Swiss based ‘Club De Berne’.


  2. #2
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Is 18-yr-old Suspect in Charlie Hebdo Attack Innocent? Classmates Say #MouradHamydInnocent


    The 18-year-old suspect who surrendered to the French police after his name started doing the rounds in the Charlie Hebdo shooting case, is finding support among his classmates who claim he was not involved in the dastardly attack and was in class with them.

    Mourad Hamyd surrendered himself after reportedly seeing his name circulating on the media, but some reports now suggest that he had only gone to the police to clarify that he was in school at the time of the attack.

    Hamyd, reportedly a student at a high school in Charleville-Mezieres near Reims has been named as one of the three suspects who attacked Charlie Hebdo office, along with two brothers - Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi.

    Authorities claimed that Hamyd, the youngest suspect, drove the car in which the attackers fled after the shooting and was identified by an ID card left behind
    in the abandoned car, but many netizens have voiced the possibility of a possible decoy.

    Now, several of Hamyd's classmates are defending him on social media, with the hastag #MouradHamydInnocent trending on Twitter in France.

    The translated French tweets have messages that read: "What is this madness, the Mourad Hamyd was with me this morning" and "Mourad Hamyd wrongly accused, he was in class at the time of the facts, his classmates can attest."

    Some of the other messages on Twitter, as translated on storify.com are as follows:

    "This guy spends his day in class, and he is guilty of an attack."

    "He was with me in high school, I saw that smile this morning as usual. He would never Please support."


    Charlie Hebdo shooting suspect defended by classmates on Twitter


    Students say suspected getaway driver Mourad Hamyd was in class at time of attack, in series of tweets under hashtag #MouradHamydInnocent

    Classmates of an 18-year-old accused of being the getaway driver in the deadly attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine offices in Paris on Wednesday have defended him on Twitter, saying he was in class when masked gunmen opened fire.

    Mourad Hamyd turned himself in to police in his home town of Charleville-Mézières, near the Belgian border, after he was named as one of three suspects in the attack, which killed 12, and saw his name on social media.

    Soon afterwards, his classmates started tweeting under the hashtag #MouradHamydInnocent. “He’s in my class, and he was there for lessons this morning,” wrote @babydroma. Her account has been active since 2012, and before Wednesday was full of chatter about teachers and lessons, with a picture of film star James Franco as wallpaper.

    Apparently frustrated by journalists and others questioning her identity and motive, a couple of hours later she added: “I swear to you I haven’t spoken to Mourad more than five times, but I felt obliged to help him.” She later clarified that they had been in a philosophy class at the time of the attack.

    Others also joined in on the same hashtag: “Imagine that you went to class with your mate, and then in the evening he is accused of [taking part in] the attack. Please retweet #MouradHamydInnocent,” said @_neednobody. The 18-year-old, called Laura, has a longstanding account with tens of thousands of tweets and says she is studying for a BTS, a vocational qualification.

    Another teenager, @AnyceDz, who said Hamyd was a friend and the two had spent the morning together, changed his profile name to #MouradHamydInnocent. He tweeted that school officials had advised him to stop giving interviews about his friend.



    In an attempt to save their false flag operation they are harassing the classmates and questioning them for supporting an innocent Muslim. This is how they do these false flags, they do the crime and then blame it on the Muslims, and pick some Muslims as scapegoats to take the blame.

  3. #3
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Paris Attack Smacks Of False Flag

    HOW MANY MOSSAD AGENTS does it take to pull off a false flag?

    Just enough to have a getaway car ready at a Kosher Restaurant two miles from theCharlie Hebdo scene in Paris.

    The perpetrators’ first car, a black Citroen, was abandoned at the restaurant while a grey Renault was provided for the murderers to flee in, reportedly “carjacked” as per the French police.

    One look at how carefully the getaway car was parked in front of the Kosher Restaurant suggests that the attackers were in no hurry to escape since they knew that a safe haven and another car was ready for them for the second leg of their getaway.

    Why the French police are claiming the Renault getaway vehicle was “carjacked” appears to cover the fact that the Renault was provided by, as this author sees it, Jewish accomplices, that is, Sayanim.

    Many anomalies support this author’s theory that the Charlie Hebdo attack was a Mossadfalse flag operation.


    FIRST OF ALL, shouts of “Allah Akbar” and “The Prophet Has Been Avenged” by the attackers were enunciated in perfect French.

    If they were truly extremist Muslims, as the press is reporting it, the second slogan would also have been expressed in Arabic.

    Second, how did the perpetrators know that Charlie Hebdo headquarters was going to hold a full member staff meeting at the very hour of their attack? Only, an inside informer (Read: Sayanim) could have tipped them off.

    Then, the gunmen, knowing in advance the names of their targets, headed to the second floor editorial department where the meeting was held and asked people who they were, from the list of names, before shooting.

    They didn’t just go in shooting up the place like a typical ‘terrorist’ attack would have been carried out.

    Third, the neatly parked ‘abandoned’ car conveniently had the ID of one of the ‘terrorists.’

    SURELY, THIS IS classic Mossad of pulling an ID of a formerly charged ‘criminal’ already in the intelligence system readily available to be set up as a patsy.

    Seriously, who takes their ID on a commando-style ‘terror attack?’

    Cui bono? Jews…to further inflame Islamophobia, specifically in this case with the French establishment which has been putting forth pro-Palestinian overtures of late…greatly “disappointing” Tel Aviv.

    Right on cue, Netanyahu chimed in, “The heinous acts in Paris today won’t be the last.”

    By way of deception wage war, goes the Mossad motto.

    And yet another Jewish deception fools the Goyim once again.


    We are NOT Charlie! #FalseFlag

    False Flag Weekly News just finished a special report on the Charlie Hebdo spectacular in Paris:

    I also did a special radio show on Charlie Hebdo, including a verbal battle with neocon propagandist Patrick Poole.

    Whenever something like this happens, it keeps people like me really, really busy.

    It took me about five minutes to figure out that the Charlie Hebdo shooting in Paris was probably a false flag. So I whipped out a quick blog entry that went viral (almost 15,000 reads in 24 hours). Et voila:

    Paris “Charlie Hebdo Attack”: Another Zionist False Flag?

    Just one month ago, France set off a stampede when its lower house voted to recognize Palestine. Now Palestine is in the International Criminal Court, poised to take down Israel for genocide.

    Suddenly “Islamic terror strikes France.” Is Paris being punished for its pro-Palestine vote?

    In late 2013, Malaysia’s Kuala Lumpur Tribunal found Israel guilty of genocide. A few months later, Malaysian planes started falling out of the sky.

    In 2011, Norway’s Labor Party’s youth wing was poised to impose a complete blockade on Israel. Suddenly the entire leadership of the Party’s youth wing was slaughtered in a professional operation falsely attributed to a lone nut, Anders Breivik.

    NoLiesRadio produce Allan Rees writes:

    They had a camera well placed beforehand to film the attack.
    They spoke perfect French
    Killed with military precision.
    Dressed in military style.
    Killed from a target list.
    Got away clean.
    French President shows up afterwards and then convenes emergency meeting on what measures to enact.
    Multiple shooters.
    Could this be false flag from French Intel Agency?
    Others are calling it a likely false flag here and here.

    So far, it walks like one, it talks like one, and it perpetuates the 9/11 false-flag narrative about “radical Islam” like one. So I’m calling it a false flag until proven otherwise.

    One thing I missed in the original blog post: The timing of the Charlie Hebdo event was suspicious, not only because it closely followed Netanyahu’s threat that France was making a grave mistake by supporting Palestinian statehood and unleashed pre-scripted Zionist talking points against France’s pro-Palestine position……But also because the Zionists are panicking at the success of European anti-New-World-Order parties in general, and the French Marine LePen/Alain Soral/Dieudonné contingent in particular.

    This event looks like it was orchestrated to use against Soral and Dieudonné, who had been obscenely attacked in Charlie Hebdo right before the big false flag. Shortly after the Charlie Hebdo news broke, Zionist assets were already tweeting attacks on Soral and Dieudonné as if they were reading from the same pre-scripted list of talking points.Of the many suspicious bits of forensic evidence that Charlie Hebdo was a false flag, one of the most striking was the news that one of the alleged terrorists supposedly dropped his ID card at the scene of the crime! (Shades of Satam al-Suqami’s “magic passport” planted near the WTC rubble on 9/11.)

    Then there are the video anomalies. Videos of the supposed execution-style slaying of a police officer don’t feature the blood or blast effects one would expect. VT Editor Gordon Duff has cited ballistics experts who say footage of AK47 rounds supposedly hitting concrete with no visible effect, while the reports lack the echo of life fire bullets.


    reader comments:

    Note: Paris massacre by "Islamists" came in the middle of child sex abuse scandals involving UK "Royals" and American "elite"

  4. #4
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    CNN Anchor Claims Israel Propagandists Distorting France Attack


    A CNN anchor claimed that Israeli propagandists are distorting the truth behind the terrorist attack on French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and trying to sow anti-Muslim sentiment on Wednesday evening.

    Repeatedly stating that it was his “Friday night” and he just wanted to relax, CNN anchor Jim Clancy argued on Twitter that the Charlie Hebdo cartoons did not actually mock the Islamic prophet Muhammad and claimed that those who disagreed with him were part of a pro-Israel propaganda campaign.

    Clancy appears to have removed some of the more inflammatory tweets, but several still remain on his Twitter page. A spokesperson for CNN did not respond to request for comment.

    “The cartoons NEVER mocked the Prophet,” wrote Clancy on Wednesday night. “They mocked how the COWARDS tried to distort his word.”

    When this claim was disputed by some of his followers, Clancy suggested they were engaging in “hasbara,” an Israeli PR effort.

    “Get a grip junior,” Clancy wrote to @HumanRights2K, a Belgium-based human rights news feed. “It’s my Friday night. You and the Hasbara team need to pick on some cripple at the edge of the herd.”

    Clancy also tweeted “hasbara” in response to a comment from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Oren Kessler, and added, “The Hasbara (Israeli explaining the inconsistencies of Human Rights) team has declared victory over [me]. Next up, [International Criminal Court].” The second tweet appears to have been removed.

    Clancy went on to accuse pro-Israel blogger Elder of Ziyon and a Twitter user called @JewsMakingNews of being “part of a campaign to do PR for Israel.” The tweet has also been removed.

    Jews Making News is an anti-Semitic Twitter feed devoted to “exposing” alleged Jewish global domination and promoting Holocaust-denial. It is unclear why Clancy named either of the Twitter users as Israeli PR agents.

    Clancy’s followers appeared baffled by his allegations, with one asking “Are you drunk right now or something?”

    This was not the first time Clancy, who covers foreign affairs, made controversial comments related to Israel. He was criticized last April after he asked former Israeli ambassador Dore Gold whether Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu “personally order[ed]” airstrikes on Gaza as a response to a unity deal between Fatah and Hamas. Clancy also praised the deal as a way to bring “fresh blood” into the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

    Clancy linked to an article in July by Israel lobby conspiracy theorist Stephen Walt headlined “AIPAC is the Only Explanation for America’s Morally Bankrupt Israel Policy.” Clancy wrote that the article “connects the dots for Americans who want to know why US Mideast policy is a mess.”

    Clancy also gave a visiting lecture in 2013 for journalists with the Jordan Media Institute. The organization was criticized for promoting Ahlam Tamimi, one of the participants in the 2001 Sbarro restaurant bombing in Israel, as a journalistic “success model.”

    The bombing killed 15 and injured 130. Tamimi was released as part of a prisoner exchange in 2011, and went on to host a Hamas TV show.


  5. #5
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Charlie Hebdo – I Smell False Flag

    Guest post by piere le pen

    There are many unanswered questions about the Charlie Hebdo incident which has gripped the world.

    Much has been said and written but much remains a mystery, for example how was it that the killers knew that all those who were involved in the obscene cartoons depicting the Prophet of Islam were, conveniently going to be in one place? How would they have obtained this level of information? These same individuals were provided with police protection since the cartoon fiasco, why was this protection so lax when a high level meeting was being convened including all the instigators of the cartoon fiasco? Is it also not co-incidental and rather suspicious that earlier this week, Charb who was the editor of Charlie Hebdo who was killed, released a cartoon which was headlined: “Still no attacks in France” and showed an Islamist militant with the speech bubbles: “Wait! We still have until the end of January to present our wishes” – a satirical play on New Year wishes. Are we not to also question why we have no statement or video message from the attackers claiming responsibility for the attacks as is usual in such cases? Instead, conveniently we have the attackers openly shouting their reasons “we avenged Prophet Muhammad”.

    What about the attackers themselves. Well, eyewitness accounts have confirmed the following:

    * That they were “extremely well-trained”.
    * That “knew exactly what they had to do and exactly where to shoot”
    * That the “car drove off almost casually”
    * “At first I thought it was special forces chasing drug traffickers or something”

    The last point noted that it was thought that they were “special forces” is an intriguing prospect given all the ambiguities noted above. The question which therefore arises is could this be a false flag operation?

    False flag describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organisations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organisation behind an operation. Geraint Hughes uses the term to refer to those acts carried out by “military or security force personnel, which are then blamed on terrorists”.

    In its most modern usage, the term may also refer to those events which governments are cognizant of and able to stop but choose to allow to happen (or “stand down”), as a strategy to entangle or prepare the nation for war. Furthermore, the term “false flag terrorism” may even be used in those instances when violence is carried out by groups or organisations which, whether they know it or not, are being supported or controlled by the “victim” nation. De Haven-Smith argues that the terminology has become looser in recent years due to the increasingly complex levels of “duplicity” and “international intrigue” between states.

    Although Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency is the world’s most specialists in the art of false flag operations, France of course have history in this also. False flag tactics were also employed during the Algerian civil war, starting in the middle of 1994. Death squads composed of French Département du Renseignement et de la Sécurité (DRS) security forces disguised themselves as Islamist terrorists and committed false flag terror attacks. Such groups included the Organisation of Young Free Algerians (OJAL) or the Secret Organisation for the Safeguard of the Algerian Republic (OSSRA). According to Roger Faligot and Pascal Kropp (1999), the OJAL was reminiscent of “the Organization of the French Algerian Resistance (ORAF), a group of counter-terrorists created in December 1956 by the Direction de la surveillance du territoire (Territorial Surveillance Directorate, or DST) whose mission was to carry out terrorist attacks with the aim of quashing any hopes of political compromise – please see here. Another example of course was the Masada Action and Defense Movement (French white supremacists, under the guise of a fake extremist Zionist movement, conducted bombings of Arab targets in France in an attempt to start a war between French Arabs and Jews).

    There are many other examples however, I am sure you understand what is being said here. You have every right not to just lap up everything the media is feeding you and to be inquisitive and question what exactly happened here.

    A person may might ask what is to be gained in carrying out such an operation? Well, so much can be achieved. With French elections coming up, it almost guarantees the racist Len Pen being elected. In addition, it would give all western states the justification to further scare monger and control the masses whilst passing draconian anti-terror laws to further push the neoconservative agenda articulated by its hawks such as Douglas Murray in engaging in a war with Muslims abroad and a cold war with Muslims at home. In addition, it will be made out as though these individuals had travelled to and trained in Syria to further criminalise any efforts to help the plight of the Syrians and to strengthen the misconceived concept of blow back.

    There is no need to jump to any conclusions but it is imperative that questions are asked and that the historical, circumstantial and political climate and contexts are considered.


  6. #6
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    WikiLeaks: Jewish Pro-Censorship Lobby Legitimized Attacks on Charlie Hebdo

    by John Nolte - 8 Jan 2015

    The verified Twitter account for WikiLeaks, the organization founded by Julian Assange that publishes state secrets, lashed out Thursday at something called the “Jewish pro-censorship lobby” for “legitimiz[ing] attacks on “Charlie Hebdo for ‘offensive’ speech.”:

    How the Jewish pro-censorship lobby legitimized attacks on Carlie Hebdo for “offensive” speech http://t.co/6Ts6rWgw7p #CharlieHebdo

    — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 8, 2015

    While Google is unable to find anything resembling an official or organized “Jewish pro-censorship lobby,” to back its defamation, WikiLeaks links to a 5 year-old Daily Telegraph report about a Charlie Hebdo cartoonist facing charges of anti-Semitism in a French court. Mauraice Sinet, who was 80 at the time, faced these charges (and was fired by Charlie Hebdo) over a column some interpreted as “linking prejudice about Jews and social success.”

    France’s notorious Hate Speech Laws, however, are not designed to just protect Jews.

    France’s principal piece of hate speech legislation is the Press Law of 1881, in which Section 24 criminalizes incitement to racial discrimination, hatred, or violence on the basis of one’s origin or membership (or non-membership) in an ethic, national, racial, or religious group. A criminal code provision likewise makes it an offense to engage in similar conduct via private communication.

    There are numerous instances of French citizens, including actress Brigitte Bardot and even legitimate presidential contenders, finding themselves hauled before French courts and convicted of speech crimes against Muslims.


    French cartoonist Sine on trial on charges of anti-Semitism over Sarkozy jibe

    A Left-wing cartoonist is to go on trial on Tuesday on charges of anti-Semitism for suggesting Jean Sarkozy, the son of the French president, was converting to Judaism for financial reasons.

    By Henry Samuel in Paris - 27 Jan 2009

    Maurice Sinet, 80, who works under the pen name Sine, faces charges of "inciting racial hatred" for a column he wrote last July in the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. The piece sparked a summer slanging match among the Parisian intelligentsia and ended in his dismissal from the magazine.

    "L'affaire Sine" followed the engagement of Mr. Sarkozy, 22, to Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, the Jewish heiress of an electronic goods chain. Commenting on an unfounded rumor that the president's son planned to convert to Judaism, Sine quipped: "He'll go a long way in life, that little lad."

    A high-profile political commentator slammed the column as linking prejudice about Jews and social success. Charlie Hebdo's editor, Philippe Val, asked Sinet to apologize but he refused, exclaiming: "I'd rather cut my balls off."

    Mr. Val's decision to fire Sine was backed by a group of eminent intellectuals, including the philosopher Bernard-Henry Lévy, but parts of the libertarian Left defended him, citing the right to free speech.

    Last week, the anti-capitalist, anti-clerical Sine, who recently founded his own weekly magazine, Sine Hebdo, took Claude Askolovitch, the journalist who first accused him of anti-Semitism, to court for slander in a separate case.

    "When I heard that I was being treated as anti-Semitic, my blood ran cold," he said during the trial, adding that if Mr. Askolovitch had turned up in person, "it is not a trial he would have had but a head butt."

    Sine is the defendant in Tuesday's court case in Lyon, southern France. The plaintiff is the anti-racism and anti-Semitism group, Licra.

    The issue of anti-Semitism, already sensitive in a country still marked by the Alfred Dreyfus affair - the Jewish army captain wrongly accused of spying in the 19th century – has become even more charged in recent weeks due to Israel's Gaza offensive; France was hit by a series of anti-Semitic acts, including firebomb attacks on synagogues.

    The young Mr. Sarkozy, who is now the leader of his father's party in the president's old fiefdom, the chic Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine, has since married. He has denied converting to Judaism.



    This is the same magazine that is involved with the anti-Islamic cartoons and the shooting that took place this week. This cartoonist was fired for simply saying that Sarkozy might become a Jew and become successful, yet when the same magazine attacks Islam then they tell the Muslims that it's free speech and the Muslims need to accept it.

  7. #7
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Paris attack designed to shore up France’s vassal status: Roberts


    A former White House official says the terrorist attack that killed 12 people on Wednesday in Paris was a false flag operation “designed to shore up France’s vassal status to Washington.”

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, who was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, made the remarks in an article published on Thursday.

    “The suspects can be both guilty and patsies. Just remember all the terrorist plots created by the FBI that served to make the terrorism threat real to Americans,” he wrote.

    He said that the French economy is suffering from the US-imposed sanctions against Russia. “Shipyards are impacted from being unable to deliver Russian orders due to France’s vassalage status to Washington, and other aspects of the French economy are being adversely impacted by sanctions that Washington forced its NATO puppet states to apply to Russia.”

    Dr. Roberts stated that French President Francois Hollande this week said that the sanctions against Russia should end. “This is too much foreign policy independence on France’s part for Washington.”

    He added that the CIA has apparently resurrected a policy that it followed against Europeans during the post-WW II era when the US spy agency would carry out attacks in European states and blame them on communist groups.

    Dr. Roberts said now the US agencies have planned false flag operations in Europe to create hatred against Muslims and bring European countries under Washington’s sphere of influence.

    He noted that “the attack on Charlie Hebdo was an inside job and that people identified by NSA as hostile to the Western wars against Muslims are going to be framed for an inside job designed to pull France firmly back under Washington’s thumb.”

    The widely read columnist stated that the US “government tells Americans whatever story the government puts together and sits and laughs at the gullibility of the public.”


    Planted ID card exposes Paris false flag


    French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve says the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo would never have been caught had they not made one fatal mistake: They conveniently left an ID card in their abandoned getaway car.

    Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars?

    An ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a wallet or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles approximately 50,000 times in my life, and I think my wallet might have slipped out of my pocket and fallen into the crack between the driver’s seat and the door...once.

    What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
    So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?

    Assuming that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly obvious inference.

    The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.

    Police and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to support their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down guns, which the police call “ham sandwiches,” are kept in police locker rooms and carried in police cars in case they are needed.
    Likewise, throw-down ID cards and other “incriminating” documents are routinely used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals who orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the September 11th, 2001 inside job.

    Intelligence agents planted not just one, but two “magic suitcases” designed to incriminate Mohamed Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of September 11th. According to Der Spiegel’s book Inside 9/11: What Really Happened, the first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a self-described “good Samaritan burglar.” The so-called burglar claimed to have stolen Atta’s suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this kind-hearted burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the suitcase to the authorities.

    According to Der Spiegel, the German police, not being fools, knew that the self-styled burglar was not really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent planting fake evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as saying: “The only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?” (“CIA and Mossad,” answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas Von Bülow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)

    Despite its absurd origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides virtually the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Atta’s supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good Samaritan burglar’s suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta – the one in Germany – was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken architecture student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet the “Atta” who made a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11, staging memorable public scenes while all but wearing an “I am an al-Qaeda terrorist” sign around his neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent loudmouthed braggart who dated strippers, disemboweled kittens, and spoke fluent Hebrew.

    The Hebrew-speaking Atta’s second and better-known “magic suitcase” was the one he allegedly checked in on his early morning flight from Portland, Maine to Boston on September 11th, 2001. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the suitcase was miraculously preserved and delivered to the authorities when it somehow failed to make the transfer from Atta’s Portland-to-Boston commuter flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred as it should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a fireball at the World Trade Center.
    This magic suitcase provided the only evidence allowing authorities to identify the alleged 19 hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the 9/11 passenger lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees remember having ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none of the hundreds of security cameras at Boston’s Logan Airport, Washington D.C.’s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated frame of any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)

    This suitcase not only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Atta’s supposed last will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will onto a doomed plane?) Britain’s dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk has ridiculed Atta’s alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a botched bismillah: “In the name of God, myself, and my family...” No Muslim would ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document purporting to be Atta’s will must have been forged by an incompetent intelligence agent. The suitcase was obviously planted.

    And that is not just Robert Fisk’s opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of American investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as saying, with regard to Atta’s magic suitcase: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.”

    Atta’s two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11 evidence. Another is the “magic passport” of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam al-Suqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the “magic bullet” of the JFK assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous individual, with no chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking ground where two 110-story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.

    But Atta’s magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most pathetically-planted 9/11 item of them all: The “Fatty Bin Laden confession video” supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous US soldier in Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to be brandished by the Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin Laden’s guilt.

    Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin Laden, has categorically stated of this video: “It’s bogus!” Lawrence adds that his many acquaintances in the US intelligence community’s Bin Laden units know that the video is bogus – but are afraid to say so in public, because they are afraid of the implications of Bin Laden’s innocence.

    These and other examples show that the intelligence agents who orchestrate false-flag terror spectacles often do not even bother to disguise the blatantly-fabricated nature of the planted evidence used to implicate patsies.

    So we should not be terribly surprised when the French police tell us – with a straight face – that a highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID card in an abandoned getaway car.


  8. #8
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Israeli TV: Hollande didn’t want Netanyahu at Paris march

    French president thought PM would be divisive presence, report claims; highlighted Abbas invite when Netanyahu insisted on coming


    French President Francois Hollande did not want Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attend Sunday’s historic march in Paris, believing the Israeli leader’s presence at the rally would be “divisive,” Israeli media reported Sunday.

    Netanyahu initially accepted Paris’s wishes and on Saturday cited security concerns to explain why he would not attend the event, which was organized in a show of solidarity and defiance after terrorist attacks in the French capital, which claimed 17 lives. Among the victims were four Jews at a kosher supermarket and a Muslim police officer.

    However, the Prime Minister changed his mind later Saturday after Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett announced they would join the march, Israel’s Channel 2 news reported.

    When Netanyahu’s office told the Elysee Palace that he would be coming after all, France responded by highlighting that it was extending an invitation to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, according to the report. The French government also announced a planned meeting between Hollande and Abbas Saturday night.

    Netanyahu was initially situated in a second row of leaders, but shimmied his way into the front row, alongside Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, Hollande, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, EU Council President Donald Tusk and Abbas.

    Some 1.5 million people marched in the massive rally, the largest of a series of demonstrations around France that brought some 3.7 million people out into the streets, according to figures cited by AFP.

    The leaders observed a minute’s silence as the march got underway. A sea of humanity flowed through Paris’s iconic streets, breaking into applause and spontaneous renditions of the national anthem, as a shell-shocked France mourned the victims of three days of bloody violence.


    European Jewish group slams Netanyahu's call for French Jews to immigrate to Israel


    Campaign, launched after Paris attacks, 'severely weakens and damages the Jewish communities that have the right to live securely wherever they are,' EJA director says.The head of the largest advocate for the Jewish organizations and communities in Europe sharply criticized Israel's call for increased immigration of the Continent's Jews to Israel in the wake of the attacks in Paris.

    Rabbi Menachem Margolin, director of the European Jewish Association, was quoted by the website nrg.co.il as saying that he regretted that "after every anti-Semitic attack in Europe, the Israeli government issues the same statements about the importance of aliyah [immigration to Israel], rather than employ every diplomatic and informational means at its disposal to strengthen the safety of Jewish life in Europe."

    NRG reported that Margolin said that Jews who have an attachment to Israel do not need this call, and they continue to emigrate to Israel in the wake of the events [like those] over the weekend in Paris. ..."

    The rabbi said that "every such Israeli campaign severely weakens and damages the Jewish communities that have the right to live securely wherever they are."

    The "reality is that a large majority of European Jews do not plan to emigrate to Israel," Margolin said, according to NRG.

    "The Israeli government must recognize this reality and also remember the strategic importance of the Jewish communities as supporters of Israel in the countries in which they live."

    Israel's government "must cease this Pavlovian reaction every time Jews in Europe are attacked," he said.

    Margolin said that the EJA had "asked the interior ministers of European Union nations to approve weapons-carry permits and self-defense training for the heads of Jewish communities ... as well as for owners of businesses with substantial Jewish customer bases," NRG reported.

    The EJA, based in Paris, says on its website that because of a "lack of resources, the relationships between Israel, European countries and the European Jewish Diaspora [don't] seem to be a top priority for the State of Israel."


  9. #9
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    New Info Confirms CIA Behind Paris Attack


    “So at the end of the day, we have to understand who is gaining by all these alleged attacks”

    The new information has almost confirmed that Paris attack was a false flag operation carried out by the CIA, says Soraya Sepahpour Ulrich, an independent researcher and writer based in Irvine, California.

    According to The Associated Press, one of the men responsible for last week's terrorist attack that killed 12 people in the French capital claimed to have lived with the Nigerian man behind the failed al-Qaeda “underwear bomb” plot five years ago, Yemeni Journalist and researcher Mohammed al-Kibsi who met Said Kouachi, the alleged Paris attacker, said on Monday.

    In a phone interview with Press TV on Tuesday, Ulrich said, “The whole Paris incident has been a puzzle for many... and one has to find connections to find what really is going on.”

    “We have been told by the mainstream media, the Western media, that a Yemeni reporter has claimed that he had interviewed Kouachi who was responsible for the Paris attack, or one of those who were responsible,” she said.

    “And he had ties with ‘the underwear bomber’, ‘the underwear bomber’ who was held responsible for wanting to blow up an airliner at Christmas in 2009,” Ulrich added.

    Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was convicted of attempting to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his underwear while on board Northwest Airlines Flight 253, en route from Amsterdam to Detroit, Michigan.

    “Well, it so happens that the mainstream media here is so busy turning up this information that they turned to forget the very information they gave us in the first place. For example, in 2012, we were told that ‘the underwear bomber’ was in fact working with the CIA intelligence and with the Saudis,” she pointed out.

    US and Yemeni officials told The Associated Press in May 2012 that the so-called underwear bomber was in fact working under cover for Saudi intelligence and the CIA when he was given a new non-metallic type bomb aimed at getting past airport security.

    Ulrich said it is important to mention that the so-called underwear bomber slipped past the security “when Israeli intelligence was in charge of the Amsterdam airport -- [its] security.”

    She added that intelligence officials failed to scrutinize the bomb and helped the bomber get on the plane, which “indicates to me that they all were aware of this individual’s job.”

    “Six or seven months ago, the UK airport security supposedly received a warning from the US intelligence… that al-Qaeda terrorists were going to attack airports and airliners using a new generation of non-metallic bombs developed by them in Syria and Yemen,” Ulrich said.

    “What is really very alarming for me is all this information, or misinformation we are getting,” she stated. “We have to understand who gain from” all this.

    A spate of violent incidents, including the attack at the Paris office of controversial magazine Charlie Hebdo, left at least 17 people dead last week in the French capital.

    Two days after the Charlie Hebdo attack, Said and Cherif Kouachi, suspects, were killed after being cornered at a printing workshop in the French town of Dammartin-en-Goele.

    “So at the end of the day, we have to understand who is gaining by all these alleged attacks,” Ulrich emphasized. People are not being told the truth; they are “told a bunch of lies that are supposedly not connected and somehow when they do get connected we trace it back to the intelligence services, like the CIA.”

    “So we have to be very alert, and do not forget what we read yesterday in order to absorb what we are reading today and connect the dots ourselves,” she warned.

    “I mean many have had doubts about the veracity of the incident in Paris. Many had thought it to be a false flag operation. And now with this new information they are feeding us and tying [it] to the underwear bomber who worked for the CIA, it has virtually established the fact that it was indeed a false flag operation,” Ulrich concluded.


    Turkish president: 'the West' behind Charlie attacks and deliberately 'blaming Muslims'


    The President of Turkey has suggested French security forces are to blame for the deadly terrorist attacks in Paris last week, since the culprits had recently served prison sentences.

    Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused the West of 'playing games with the Islamic world', warning fellow Muslims to be 'aware'.

    Erdogan said Muslims are 'paying the price' for the attacks on satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish kosher supermarket in Paris last week. 'French citizens carry out such a massacre, and Muslims pay the price,' Erdogan said yesterday.

    'That's very meaningful ... Doesn't their intelligence organisation track those who leave prison?

    'Games are being played with the Islamic world, we need to be aware of this.

    'The West's hypocrisy is obvious. As Muslims, we've never taken part in terrorist massacres. Behind these lie racism, hate speech and Islamophobia,' Erdogan added.

    Erdogan also denounced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for attending a solidarity rally in France on Sunday with other world leaders after the Paris attacks.

    'How can a man who has killed 2,500 people in Gaza with state terrorism wave his hand in Paris, like people are waiting in excitement for him to do so? How dare he go there?' he said.

    Erdogan did not attend the Sunday march, though Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu participated.

    Erdogan is not the only senior Turkish politician publicly voicing conspiracy theories over the Paris attacks.

    The Mayor of Ankara, Melih Gokcek, said he was convinced the Israeli intelligence service Mossad was behind the attacks, linking them to France's recent move towards recognising Palestine as an independent state.

    'Mossad is definitely behind such incidents… it is boosting enmity towards Islam.' Mr Gokcek said, according to Financial Times.

    In Russia, several pro-Kremlin commentators blamed the United States and the CIA for the attack, the newspaper reported.

    One, Alexei Martynov, director of the International Institute for New States, said 'I am sure that some American supervisors are responsible for the terror attacks in Paris, or in any case the Islamists who carried them out.'

    source: Dailymail


    All these so called "conspiracy theories" from politicians, military personnel, media personnel, researchers and others of other professions shows that people are waking up to the leis (official stories) and see the false flags for what they are. No one is buying the official narrative crap anymore.

    French Police Commissioner Suicided After Attempting To Issue Murder Warrant Against President Obama


    An absolutely stunning Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today appears to show why all top US officials failed to join their counterparts in Paris yesterday who marched in solidarity against the Charlie Hebdo Massacre as it reveals a top French police commissioner was “suicided” within hours of his attempting to obtain a European Arrest Warrant for President Barack Obama and other as yet unnamed American leaders.

    According to this report, French police Commissioner Helric Fredou [Photo top left] was tasked immediately after the 7 January Charlie Hebdo Massacre with the examination of documents contained in a small backpack found in the getaway car used by the killers Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, and which contained the driver’s license/identity card of Saïd.

    Also discovered by Police Commissioner Fredou in this small backpack, SVR analyst in this report say, were a number of “cryptic documents” and telephone numbers, one of the most important being a US cell-phone number “directly linked” to former US general and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director David Petraeus. [Photo 3rd left]

    Upon Police Commissioner Fredou’s discovery of this “Petraeus-link”, this report further states, SVR signals intelligence data show he contacted Paris prosecutor François Molins and requested that the Cour D'assises (Assize Court) issue an immediate European Arrest Warrant for President Barack Obama and “other” such American officials to be named within 24 hours.

    Within 3 hours of Police Commissioner Fredou making this request, however, this report continues, his body was found by his desk in his office with a single gunshot to the head at 0100hr on Thursday 8 January that was quickly ruled a suicide; and Obama regime officials began flooding the US media with reports that former CIA director Petraeus was in danger of being arrested on felony charges relating to classified materials found in his mistresses possession.

    Though this SVR report doesn’t explicitly state what evidence Police Commissioner Fredou discovered to make his unprecedented request to have the American President arrested, it does allude to a much larger conspiracy surrounding the Charlie Hebdo Massacre which not only involves Saudi Arabia, but also the CIA.

    Most critical to note about the Charlie Hebdo Massacre, this report states, is that it occurred 48 hours after French President François Hollande, on 5 January, stated to the Obama regime that the Western sanctions against Russia must be immediately ended.

    Equally important to note, SVR analysts in this report point out, are that French authorities had, also, been warned about an impending attack upon their nation on 4 January when Saudi Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud delivered the warning to French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and as we had previously reported on.

    Also to be noted is that the SVR in their previous (7 January) report noted that the killers behind the Charlie Hebdo Massacre were terror operatives of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), a fact confirmed on 11 January when a martyrdom video of one of the killers named Amedy Coulibaly was released by ISIS. [Note: this previous report should be read as it provides needed context for this one.]

    As France today begins to deploy an additional 10,000 troops throughout their country to (hopefully) forestall further attacks, and the West gears up for a fresh rampage across the war-scarred Middle East in response to this massacre, this report concludes, it should not be forgotten that the goal of Islamic violence is to bring down society’s fist on Europe’s Muslim minority – all the better to sweep them up into the waiting arms of al-Qaeda, the ISIS, or whatever form these fanatics invent.

    But to who the real terrorist fanatics are, however, and according to the esteemed antiwar American author Justin Raimondo, one needs look no further than the corridors of Washington D.C., and of which he states:

    My biggest fear is that we’ll all wake up one day to find that the monsters are right here, where they’ve always been. By then it will be too late to leash them and put them in their proper place, which is a zoo.”


  10. #10
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    The Charlie Hebdo Story Doesn’t Wash

    paris march.jpg

    The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation. The attack on the cartoonists’ office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with highly trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional. It is like two different sets of people.

    Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded, an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.

    It is a plausible inference that the ID left behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything, and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being murdered by security forces as a terrorist.

    Hamyd Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi. If so, this makes him the despoiler of a false flag attack. Authorities will have to say that despite being wrong about Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers. Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of confession that supports the official story. https://www.intellihub.com/18-year-o...e-claims-alibi

    The American and European media have ignored the fact that Mourad turned himself in for protection from being killed as a terrorist as he has an alibi. I googled Hamid Mourad and all I found (January 12) was the main US and European media reporting that the third suspect had turned himself in. The reason for his surrender was left out of the reports. The news was reported in a way that gave credence to the accusation that the suspect who turned himself in was part of the attack on Charlie Hebdo. Not a single US mainstream media source reported that the alleged suspect turned himself in because he has an ironclad alibi.

    Some media merely reported Mourad’s surrender in a headline with no coverage in the report. The list that I googled includes the Washington Post (January 7 by Griff Witte and Anthony Faiola); Die Welt (Germany) “One suspect has turned himself in to police in connection with Wednesday’s massacre at the offices of Parisian satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo;” ABC News (January 7) “Youngest suspect in Charlie Hebdo Attack turns himself in;” CNN (January 8) “Citing sources, the Agence France Presse news agency reported that an 18-year-old suspect in the attack had surrendered to police.”

    Another puzzle in the official story that remains unreported by the presstitute media is the alleged suicide of a high ranking member of the French Judicial Police who had an important role in the Charlie Hebdo investigation. For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime, decided to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8 (both dates are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the night while writing his report on his investigation. A google search as of 6pm EST January 13 turns up no mainstream US media report of this event. The alternative media reports it, as do some UK newspapers, but without suspicion or mention whether his report has disappeared. The official story is that Fredou was suffering from “depression” and “burnout,” but no evidence is provided. Depression and burnout are the standard explanations of mysterious deaths that have unsettling implications.

    Once again we see the US print and TV media serving as a ministry of propaganda for Washington. In place of investigation, the media repeats the government’s implausible story.

    It behoves us all to think. Why would Muslims be more outraged by cartoons in a Paris magazine than by hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed by Washington and its French and NATO vassals in seven countries during the past 14 years?

    If Muslims wanted to make a point of the cartoons, why not bring a hate crime charge or lawsuit? Imagine what would happen to a European magazine that dared to satirize Jews in the way Charlie Hebdo satirized Muslims. Indeed, in Europe people are imprisoned for investigating the holocaust without entirely confirming every aspect of it.

    If a Muslim lawsuit was deep-sixed by French authorities, the Muslims would have made their point. Killing people merely contributes to the demonization of Muslims, a result that only serves Washington’s wars against Muslim countries.

    If Muslims are responsible for the attack on Charlie Hebdo, what Muslim goal did they achieve? None whatsoever. Indeed, the attack attributed to Muslims has ended French and European sympathy and support for Palestine and European opposition to more US wars against Muslims. Just recently France had voted in the UN with Palestine against the US-Israeli position. This assertion of an independent French foreign policy was reinforced by the recent statement by the President of France that the economic sanctions against Russia should be terminated.

    Clearly, France was showing too much foreign policy independence. The attack on Charlie Hebdo serves to cow France and place France back under Washington’s thumb.

    Some will contend that Muslims are sufficiently stupid to shoot themselves in the head in this way. But how do we reconcile such alleged stupidity with the alleged Muslim 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo professional attacks?

    If we believe the official story, the 9/11 attack on the US shows that 19 Muslims, largely Saudis, without any government or intelligence service support, outwitted not only all 16 US intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, Dick Cheney and all the neoconservatives in high positions throughout the US government, and airport security, but also the intelligence services of NATO and Israel’s Mossad. How can such intelligent and capable people, who delivered the most humiliating blow in world history to an alleged Superpower with no difficulty whatsoever despite giving every indication of their intentions, possibly be so stupid as to shoot themselves in the head when they could have thrown France into turmoil with a mere lawsuit?

    The Charlie Hebdo story simply doesn’t wash. If you believe it, you are no match for a Muslim.

    Some who think that they are experts will say that a false flag attack in France would be impossible without the cooperation of French intelligence. To this I say that it is practically a certainty that the CIA has more control over French intelligence than does the President of France. Operation Gladio proves this. The largest part of the government of Italy was ignorant of the bombings conducted by the CIA and Italian Intelligence against European women and children and blamed on communists in order to diminish the communist vote in elections.

    Americans are a pitifully misinformed people. All of history is a history of false flag operations. Yet Americans dismiss such proven operations as “conspiracy theories,” which merely proves that government has successfully brainwashed insouciant Americans and deprived them of the ability to recognize the truth.

    Americans are the foremost among the captive nations.

    Who will liberate them?

    Source: Paul Craig Roberts, 13 January 2015

  11. #11
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Rothschild Email: “Mossad Were Behind The Paris Attacks”


    A leaked email from Madame Rothschild in which she says that the Paris Attacks at Charlie Hebdo were “a Mossad operation”.

    The email was sent to an editor of a website called Darkmoon.me on Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 5:56 AM.

    “Muslims had nothing to do with the Paris Attacks” – it is claimed. The email below is the exact copy sent allegedly from Madame Rotchschild to Lasha Darkmoon of Darkmoon.me:

    Dear Lasha,

    I won’t write to the Comments section of your website, as you suggest, because I cannot help feeling that it is juvenile to do so. But this I will say most emphatically, based on my private sources, for as you know, I am a resident of France and have many friends in high places in Paris and elsewhere: not only do I believe that the Paris circus was not done by the Muslims, I actually know for a certainty that it was not.

    Muslims had nothing—I repeat, nothing—whatever to do with the carnage that took place in Paris last week.

    A few young ladies whom I know and who are active in the Palestinian movement—with your own countryman, George Galloway, I believe—explained everything to me two days ago. This whole event was organized in Brussels. Even Ahmed Merabet, the first French policeman purportedly shot dead, is actually not a Muslim at all: his real name is Avigdor, and his brother’s name is Maloch, recently changed to Melek—all of them crypto-Jews in the service of Israeli intelligence, i.e., Mossad agents.

    Avigdor is in Buenos Aires right now, and will remain there for six years, a standard operating procedure with those deep in Israeli psyops. After this he will resurface with a new identity, by which time of course the populace will have forgotten all about the Paris attacks.

    Remember Gladio? Well, if you don’t, you don’t have to—as you are living through it right now.

    Lasha, I am well known for being able to chatter on endlessly and to write even at greater length, so this is all for now. I will write you an email sometimes in March when I return to France and the UK from Sydney. Hopefully, there will be no more pussyfooting around, and we can sit down and enjoy a glass of wine together, as befits two queens: one a drama queen (me), the other a mystery queen (you).

    That’s all, dear. Bye for now and keep well. I’ve missed you.

    Ellie K

    P.S. Regarding the Paris farce. I forgot to mention the amount such players get paid. It is 666,000 euros or dollars, depending on the country the event is staged in. The amount may seem random and insignificant to you, but once you know how important numerology and signs are to the Kabalistic Jews, things begin to make sense.

    Moreover, the number SIX features again, you will notice, as that is the number of years during which the commandos carrying out the operation are not allowed to resurface. They have to lie low for six years, living lives of impeccable respectability under their newly invented personas. When they finally emerge into the full light of day, it is never in the country where they performed their original theatrics.

    Thus Avigdor, the ”hero” of the Paris op, and all the rest of his accomplices in crime, will start a new life elsewhere: with a new identity, new papers, a new passport—even a nice new house provided. Everything else will be given to these operatives to enable them to make a fresh start in life, including a wife or partner who is also an undercover agent. Nothing, absolutely nothing, is left to chance.


    Paris attacks: US politician Jack Lindblad claims Charlie Hebdo killings were by 'US and Mossad' to keep Israel's Netanyahu in power

    A US Senate candidate has voiced his own theories on what he believes is real reason behind the brutal attacks in Paris last week, claiming that the killings were not the work of terrorists but of the US and Mossad in a bid to keep Israel’s current Prime Minister in power.

    Speaking to PressTV, Jack Linblad, of the Green Party of LA County Council, claimed that the actions of the Kouachi brothers and Amedy Coulibaby, who collectively shot and killed 17 people in three separate and shocking attacks in Paris, were not acting on their extremist religious beliefs but were instead carrying out orders from the US and Mossad.

    Mr Linblad added that he believed the bloody attacks had been orchestrated to keep Europe “under [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s thumb” and to ensure the Israeli leader stays in power.

    He went on to claim that the Kouachi brothers’ getaway car, which was left outside of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo’s offices during an attack that left 11 journalists and one police officer dead, was left purposefully by a Mossad agent, while one of the terrorists’ passports had been left at the scene “intentionally… just like 9/11”. He called the markings a “false flag”.

    A video has since been released by the Isis militant group praising the Paris attacks, and warning that more are to come. It follows the declaration by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) that they had been responsible for the attacks.

    It is not the first time Mr Lindblad has voiced controversial theories claiming the US government has backed terrorist actions or had abused Americans’ privacy rights in order to stamp out dissent. Last year he accused the US authorities of “funding both sides” of conflicts for its own profit, and claimed the FBI surveillance measures are designed to control the American people and stop any form of revolution.

    The politician’s comments follow further suggestions of a US-led conspiracy from a Russian newspaper, which this week asserted the Paris attacks could have been the work of the US government.

    Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda ran a headline this week asking: “Did the Americans stage the terror attack in Paris?”, and published a number of interviews suggesting the US government had been behind the killings. One suggested the attacks had been revenge for French President Francois Hollande’s apparent wavering on the current sanctions in place against Russia.

    A day after 50 world leaders descended on Paris to march in solidarity against the killings, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan blamed the attacks on “the West”, claiming the “duplicity” was obvious.

    “As Muslims we have never sided with terror or massacres: racism, hate speech, Islamaphobia are behind these massacres. The culprits are clear: French citizens undertook this massacre and Muslims were blamed for it,” he claimed this week.


  12. #12
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Paris attacks: Jean-Marie Le Pen says French terror attacks were work of Western intelligence

    Front National founder gives credence to conspiracy theories in an interview with virulently anti-western

    by John Lichfield - 17 January 2015

    The Charlie Hebdo massacre may have been the work of an “intelligence agency”, working with the connivance of French authorities, according to Jean-Marie Le Pen, founder of the far right Front National.

    In an interview with a virulently anti-Western Russian newspaper, Mr. Le Pen, 86, gave credence to conspiracy theories circulating on the internet suggesting that the attack was the work of American or Israeli agents seeking to foment a civil war between Islam and the West.

    His comments – only partially retracted in an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde today – provoked outrage amongst French politicians. Marine Le Pen, his daughter, and successor as leader of the FN, has been trying to distance the party from her father’s remarks.

    Mr. Le Pen stood down as FN leader three years ago but remains President-for-life. He made the comments in an interview with Komsomolskaïa Pravda, a newspaper which had already blamed the United States for the terrorist mayhem in France.

    “The shooting at Charlie Hebdo resembles a secret service operation but we have no proof of that,” the newspaper quoted Mr. Le Pen as saying. “I don’t think it was organized by the French authorities but they permitted this crime to be committed. That, for the moment, is just a supposition.”

    To justify his comments, Mr. Le Pen pointed to the fact that one of the Kouachi brothers left his identity card in a crashed getaway car. He compared this to the “miraculous fact” that one of the passports of the 9/11 hijackers was found on the ground in New York after two planes collided with the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in 2001.

    Mr. Le Pen made two other remarks in the interview. He said that the 1,500,000 who marched “against hatred” in Paris last Sunday were not Charlies but Charlie Chaplins (ie clowns). He also said that there were 15,000,000 to 20,000,000 Muslims in France – three or four times the generally accepted figures of 5,000,000 people who are practicing Muslims or have Muslim backgrounds.

    In an interview with Le Monde today, Mr. Le Pen repeated his suspicions about the identity card but said he “could not recall” talking about “secret services” to the Russian newspaper.

    Mr. Le Pen’s original quoted remarks run directly counter to the official line of his daughter and his party. They have suggested that the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket are the final proof that France faces an “enemy within”, which has been created by immigration and open EU borders.


    Popularity ratings of French President, PM soar in aftermath of Paris attacks

    PARIS (AFP) - French President Francois Hollande's ratings, scraping historic lows just weeks ago, have soared in the aftermath of deadly Islamist attacks in Paris, data showed on Monday.

    Mr Hollande's ratings leapt by a record 21 percentage points to 40 per cent, according to an opinion poll carried out by the Ifop polling company.

    Prime Minister Manuel Valls also saw his ratings jump 17 percentage points to 61 per cent - higher than when he first took office.

    Prior to the attacks, Mr Hollande's ratings had fallen to historic lows in the face of record French unemployment and sluggish growth.



    Seems a bit convenient how historic low ratings jump so high, Bush's 9/11 and Cameron's 7/7 had the same results.

    Warning to Nations: Don't Cross Israel

    With France taking measures decisively sympathetic to Islam, why would Muslim zealots suddenly choose THIS MOMENT to murder a dozen French citizens, an act that would certainly turn French public opinion against Muslims and in favor of Israel?

    by James Perloff - January 9, 2015

    (left, Mossad cutout conveniently leaves his calling card)

    "Wake up, my fellow Christians. You are under insidious attack by the Illuminati: a secret oligarchy of Jews and Freemasons. Don't be deceived by the media which they own."

    It seems like they're spinning out PSYOPS these days faster than the writers of plots for a daily soap opera. Ottawa and Sydney are already old news.

    The three latest headlines have probably been: the Charlie Hebdo shootings in France, the downed AirAsia plane, and "North Korea hacks Sony."

    While no conclusive explanations have yet been reached, these three seemingly distinct events all have something in common: running afoul of Israel.

    On December 2nd, the France Parliament passed a resolution asking that France recognize a Palestinian state. And just a week ago, Israel informed France that it was "deeply disappointed" with France's vote on a UN resolution that would have required Israeli forces to withdraw to their pre-1967 borders by 2017.

    With France taking measures decisively sympathetic to Islam, why would Muslim zealots suddenly choose THIS MOMENT to murder a dozen French citizens, an act that would turn French public opinion against Muslims and in favor of Israel? We are told the motive for the atrocity was publication of cartoons satirizing Islam and Muhammad. What Muslim would consider cartoons more important than Palestinian rights, which Muslims have spent decades earnestly striving and bleeding for?

    Clearly, the beneficiary of the Charlie Hebdo incident is neither France nor Islam, but Israel.


    This was equally true of 9/11. Though allegedly carried out by Middle Eastern Muslims, they did not benefit - the U.S. has been making war on them ever since, and the Middle East has descended into chaos. Americans did not benefit - they have suffered the casualties and enormous costs of multiple wars, to say nothing of a growing police state at home. 9/11's SOLE BENEFICIARY is Israel - her enemies neutralized one by one, courtesy America.

    We will not repeat here the widely discussed Israeli connections to 9/11. However, let's at least quote Francesco Cossiga, former President and Prime Minister of Italy:

    "All of the democratic areas of America and of Europe . . . now know full well that the disastrous attack [9/11] was planned and executed by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist world, to falsely incriminate Arabic countries and to persuade the Western Powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan."

    The Charlie Hebdo shootings show some of the same "MO" as 9/11. A key 9/11 clue was Mohammed Atta's passport, found intact and unburned outside the World Trade Center. Supposedly it somehow survived the explosion unscathed and floated to the ground. (Atta had reported his passport stolen in 1999.) Then, of course, there were the Koran and flight training manual found in a car at Boston's Logan Airport. And the terrorists who visited a Daytona Beach strip club the night before the attacks, and bragged that America was about to see "bloodshed," conveniently leaving behind a Koran, a business card and other forms of ID.

    Likewise, in the recent Paris shootings, police have identified the alleged perpetrators by means of an ID card which one of them CONVENIENTLY left in the getaway car.

    Analysts have pointed out that the attack was carried out with military precision and skill. If you watch the footage of the getaway (shot by Amchai Stein, deputy editor of Israel's IBA Channel 1, who "just happened" to be on the scene), the perps wore hoods over their faces: they clearly did not want their identities known. Why, then, after all this precision, did they carelessly leave identification in the car? Could it be that the masked shooters were NOT the same men whom the ID card has sent the police chasing after? (Perhaps the Mossad believes all French detectives are Inspector Clouseaus, but more likely they rely on compliant Freemasons within Law Enforcement who will obey their Masonic oaths of absolute obedience and secrecy in exchange for promotions and other material rewards.)

    A detailed, ongoing debunking of the Charlie Hebdo shootings may be found at: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com.


    Next, AirAsia. In a single year, 2014, Malaysia lost three airliners: MH370, MH17, and AirAsia 8501. All three were lost under very controversial circumstances.

    Malaysia is also one of just four countries in the Far East that doesn't recognize Israel. More significantly, in late 2013, the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission, chaired by Mahathir Mohamad (Malaysia's former prime minister), declared Israel guilty of war crimes and atrocities.

    The other three Far Eastern countries that don't recognize Israel? Well, there's Indonesia, and Brunei (a small country on the island of Borneo, which is otherwise divided between Malaysia and Indonesia). 155 of Air Asia 8501's passengers were Indonesians.

    Are France and Malaysia the victims of sophisticated Israeli vengeance? If such an idea seems farfetched, is it no more absurd than the government/MSM claim that MH370 simply "disappeared." If such brutality by Israel seems unthinkable, remember its slaughter of Gaza's civilians only last summer.


    And the fourth country of the Far East that doesn't recognize Israel? It's North Korea, who is now being punished with economic sanctions after its crackerjack team of computer geeks ran circles around the hayseeds in charge of Sony's security. And why shouldn't we believe the claims of government and mainstream media about that? After all, if Muslims will commit mass murder over a cartoon, wouldn't North Koreans hack us over a movie?

    Wake up, my fellow Christians. You are under insidious attack by the Illuminati: a secret oligarchy of Jews and Freemasons. Don't be deceived by the media which they own. The political Israel of today is not the Israel of the Bible. It is a Luciferian counterfeit, engineered by the same Rothschild bankster cabal that has financed communism and world government. Ultimately, they want their beast to rule his totalitarian world from a throne in Jerusalem, pretending to be God (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4).


  13. #13
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    84% of Palestinians Believe Israel Behind Charlie Hebdo

    Palestinian Authority media blames ‘Mossad’ and Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu for staging attacks to encourage Jewish immigration.

    Official Palestinian Authority (PA) publications are repeatedly blaming Israel for the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris earlier this month, Palestinian Media Watch reports Sunday.

    The following are selected excerpts:

    [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, together with [other] Israeli leaders, is now walking in the footsteps of the first leaders of the Zionist project, who invented, created and funded the terror against the Jews in Europe, particularly in Germany, and in the Arab world. These leaders carried out [terror] operations against Jewish citizens who had been living securely in Arab and European countries, and contributed to the increase in Nazi aggression against Jews in Germany and Europe. [. . .]

    Over the next few days, the death of the officer in charge of investigating the attacks of the terrorists, who perpetrated crimes against humanity, against the French journalists and citizens, may well be revealed to have been murder, rather than suicide – for he had [discovered] the first threads of the plot leading back to Netanyahu’s Mossad (Israeli Secret Intelligence Service) – [the same Netanyahu] who wishes to realize the myth of the “Jewishness of Israel” even at the expense of new victims among the citizens of European countries.

    Similarly, Netanyahu and [Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor] Liberman had been yearning to take revenge on the European governments and parliaments for their conduct – in particular on the French policy – because of their positions on the Palestinian cause and their support for the decision to end the Israeli occupation and establish an independent Palestinian state on the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital [. . .] the scope of this article does not permit the [enumeration of the] contradictions, reported in the media regarding the Paris terror operation – contradictions which raise legitimate questions as to who is behind these crimes, if not the Israeli Intelligence, given that ‘Netanyahu’s Jewish State’ was the only one to benefit from them.” – Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Jan. 15

    Op-ed columnists at the daily, likewise, accused Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and the Mossad of planning the attacks solely to encourage French Jews to immigrate to Israel.

    In similar moves, journalist Akram Atallah of the official PA television program Panorama of the Hour also accused Israel of planning terror attacks :

    In the past, the Israeli Mossad (i.e., the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service) carried out operations (i.e., terror attacks): It bombed synagogues in order to force the Jews to emigrate. [. . .] The operation (i.e., the terror attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo) served Israel’s demographic [interests], for the Israeli media and government bodies predicted yesterday that 10,000 French Jews would immigrate to Israel… Now, when we are talking about the immigration of 10,000 French Jews next year, while last year, [only] 3,000 French Jews immigrated to Israel, in my opinion… when the number rises to 10,000, this is a very large number and this is what Israel wants. The number is not [meant to include] French Jews only…

    At present, the [Jews’] assimilation into the [European] societies is frightening as well. The message was not just meant for the Jews of France. It was [meant] for all Jews… Even today, thenumber of Jews in Israel is less than 50% – we are talking about 45-47% of the [world’s] Jews. Israel is in trouble.

    This operation (i.e., the synagogue terror attack in Israel in November 2014 in which 5 people were killed) served the propagandists of immigration and the leaders of the [Zionist] project, in order to strengthen the project. – Atallah, program broadcasted Jan 12.

    Ma’an poll published last week states that 84.4% of Palestinian Arabs believed Israel is behind the “suspicious” attacks.

    Source: israelinews

    Israel plans to encourage 120 thousand French Jews to settle in WB

    Hebrew sources disclosed an Israeli plan to encourage 120 thousand French Jews to come and settle in West Bank settlements within the coming four years.

    Israeli Minister of Immigrant Absorption, Sofa Landver, presented a plan to the Israeli government called “National Emergency Plan to Bring French Jews to Israel”.

    The Hebrew sources said the plan aims to summon 120 thousands of French Jews into occupied Palestine in the next four years. For that purpose, the Israeli ministries along with organizations will work on preparing the infrastructure for French Jews absorption and integration in the Israeli work market.

    A number of Israeli ministers called for bringing the Jews living in France to be housed in settlements constructed on Palestinian lands in the West Bank. They also called for expanding the settlements to fit the expected large numbers of French Jews.


  14. #14
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    French Journalist Arrested After Exposing Israeli Link To Paris Attacks

    Investigative journalist Hicham Hamza was detained by French police last month after exposing Israel’s role in orchestrating the Paris Attacks on November 13, 2015.

    Police charged Hamza with “violating judicial secrecy,” and have threatened him with potential prison time for a photo Hamza published online.

    Below is a translation of Hicham Hamza’s article describing his arrest:

    Detained by police for investigating the attacks in Paris

    An independent journalist and founder of the investigative website Panamza, I was detained for seven hours by police about an article in which I revealed the Israeli origin of the shocking photo of the Bataclan.

    On Monday, February 22nd, I went of my own accord to the police station in response to a summons from the Crimes Against Persons Brigade, located in the 13th arrondissement of Paris.

    The day before, I had received an “urgent” voice message from an official of the Directorate of the Judicial Police asking me to call him immediately. The reason: my December 15th article entitled “Bataclan Carnage: The shocking photo was disseminated from Jerusalem.”

    I was familiar with the Judicial Police premises, having been summoned twice to respond to “defamation” complaints brought against me by Caroline Fourest and Pierre Bergé.

    Surprise! This time, upon arrival I was “placed in custody” following a preliminary investigation by the Paris prosecutor. The officer informed me that I was now suspected of having committed – by publishing my article – the following offenses: “violation of the secrecy of an investigation”, “publication of an image that seriously undermines human dignity,” and “premeditated voluntary violence without ITT.”*

    Yes, you read that correctly.

    So what happened next?

    I was led to cell to await the arrival of my lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre so that she could be present, as the law allows, during my interrogation.

    After the interrogation, I was made to read and sign the minutes of my statements. I was then returned to detention pending the police response. Five hours later I left the musty old double-locked room to learn that no decision had been taken by the prosecutor of the Republic.

    I was finally allowed to collect my things and go.

    The merits of the case?

    While following the torturous trail of the shocking, anonymous Bataclan massacre photo, I had done my work as an investigative journalist. My objective was to fully document my sources. So in my article, I inserted the URL of the first web page containing the non-blurred Bataclan picture (which I had chosen to truncate on my site).

    The original source of the photo turned out, oddly enough, to be a tweet published by an Israeli organization headed by the U.S. neoconservative Mark Gerson.

    My practice – which is increasingly costly and risky – of ultra-sourced web journalism is my guarantee of reliability for my readers: I give them my sources to check so they can judge for themselves the veracity of my information.

    Today, the Paris prosecutor – who reports directly to the Ministry of Justice – claimed that I had supposedly “violated the secrecy of the investigation” and committed “premeditated voluntary violence” by “disseminating” the photo necessarily included in this tweet.

    Duly noted.

    I had already said in my hearing that I contested with the greatest force the validity of such accusations.

    The Paris prosecutor’s office, directed by François Molins, now has six months to decide whether to indict me.

    In the crosshairs

    Keep in mind that on December 1st, the Valls government had announced – via its inter-ministerial delegate Gilles Clavreul – its hostility against me, confessing awkwardly that it would seek “legal loopholes to get (Hamza) prosecuted.”

    Meanwhile, the arrival of Jean-Jacques Urvoas to head the Department of Justice was accompanied, more discreetly, by another little-noticed change. Thomas Andrieu, the director of the Civil Liberties and Legal Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Interior (and former right arm of Manuel Valls) became on February 5th the chief of staff of the new Minister of Justice.

    On December 2nd I had published an article about this close associate of the pro-Israel network. The chief architect of the state of emergency, Thomas Andrieu had been previously charged with carrying out the government’s promise (which was in the end never kept) of dissolving the Jewish Defense League. (Editor’s note: Responsible for dozens if not hundreds of terrorist attacks, and untold thousands of threats of violence, the JDL has been officially declared a terrorist organization by the FBI; yet due to the power of the Zionist lobby it remains legal in France, Canada, and other countries.)

    A detail that speaks volumes: In my article “Bataclan Carnage: The shocking photo was disseminated from Jerusalem,” I also raised questions about the JDL, stressing that this Zionist and racist militia, which is tolerated in France (but considered a terrorist group the United States and Israel) had directly published the gruesome Bataclan photograph on the homepage of its website.

    We still do not know all the details about provenance and chain of custody of the photograph in question, which was designed to elicit terror, and whose authenticity is has been much discussed in the foreign alternative media. What we do know is that it first appeared on the website of a webmaster based in Jerusalem.

    But it should come as no surprise that the Jewish Defense League – a small group linked to similar networks of the Israeli extreme right – could publish the photo without attracting the wrath of Bernard Cazeneuve, the Minister of the Interior who is extremely obliging to the Zionist movement and its operational relay in France: the MOSSAD.

    Surprise, surprise: Along with the explicit title “Bataclan photo of the victims,” the shocking picture, whose publication by the JDL was exposed a month later on Panamza, has since been replaced by an off-topic illustration showing … the seats in the house.

    Someone in high places must have protected the JDL from any police summons by quietly asking them to remove the photograph.

    As for me: For revealing the Israeli source of the image, which was manipulated through social media to instil fear and acceptance of draconian security measures, I was detained by police, at the request of prosecutors, for seven hours.

    Now I am under threat of new prosecutions likely to bring, this time, a prison sentence.


  15. #15
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    Exposed: French Military Caught Planning ISIS False Flag Attack


    Massive Drills on Same Day as the Paris Attack

    By Kev Baker - November 14, 2015

    We are now learning that there were massive drills being staged in Paris on the day of the attacks that claimed the lives of over 150 people. This is huge news because so often we see drills being carried out at the same time as real events unfold, and this of course is no coincidence.

    video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iebVWcVn2PU

    There we drills running at the same time as the 9/11 attack, the 7/7 attacks in London and more recently on the morning of the Boston Marathon.

    Remember Peter Powers sitting on BBC on the morning of the 7/7 attacks nonchalantly talking about how it was a lucky coincidence that there were training drills running that morning that just so happened to be simulating the very attack that unfolded?

    video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jInH6VS13YY

    By having drills, it serves a number of purposes for those pulling any strings of real events that are to unfold at the same time. Firstly, it mobilizes all the emergency services and has them ready for what some know will be mass casualties.

    Running drills provides cover for the few dark operatives that are in on the operation. Don't be thinking that everyone on the drills knew that there would be a real event, far from it. People taking part in the drill get confused as to whether its "real world" or "drill".

    video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmXRMojzuIk

    What may happen is that the operatives that are running the "terror attack" will move weapons and logistics under the premise that its part of the drill should they get caught & due to the compartmentalisation of these events, not anyone operative will be aware of the full plan so as not to be able to spill the beans in the event of being caught by genuine law enforcement and the spooks that are not on the inside.

    video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q41nZpGTm74

    At the very least it suggests someone had prior knowledge that something was going to happen, hence mobilizing the emergency services in readiness for the real deal.

    No doubt there will be more to follow as the details emerge and the stories begin to unravel.

    However, don't lose sight that despite all the shenanigans that are obviously at play here, that real people did in fact lose their lives. Thoughts and prayers to those affected.
    Full Analysis Of The Events As They Unfolded.... Scenario's, Suspects & Speculation!

    video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXux92qpz0U


    Finally Footage Emerges Of Bataclan Theatre Shootings

    By Kev Baker on November 15, 2015

    Last edited by islamirama; Apr-13-2017 at 06:41 PM.

  16. #16
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007


    BUSTED! Paris Attack Witness Describes Gunmen As White, Muscular, Clean Cut Mercenaries!

    By Matthew Drake , Dan Warburton - 15 Nov 2015

    Two heavily armed ISIS gunmen pulled up in a black Mercedes-Benz and calmly slaughtered scores of *innocent diners in a Paris bistro *before driving away.

    An eyewitness has told how 20 people were executed in a *calculated attack on a busy restaurant in the heart of the French capital as they ate at tables on the pavement.

    A shocking description of the assassins and their barbaric assault came as the first eyewitness *accounts emerged last night.

    Mahoud Admo said: “The gunman showed no emotion at all as he began spraying bullets into the *diners. He just kept reloading his machine gun and firing, without saying a thing.

    “The people outside the bar were dead straight away. There were streams of blood everywhere and broken glass. It was carnage.”

    Shocking details of the bloody attack came as France remained on high alert while special forces *continued to hunt for members of the terror cell. ISIS claimed *responsibility for the sickening *attacks which have killed at least 127 people and left up to 60 more seriously injured.

    The attack at Le Belle Equipe took place shortly after the first of three explosions rocked the Stade de France, where the host nation was playing against Germany.

    Mr Admo, 26, who was staying at the Salvation Army hostel in Rue de Charonne opposite the Le Belle Equipe, told how gunmen executed patrons in a drive-by attack.

    Trembling as he recalled how the massacre unfolded, he said: “I was just in my room and had the window open on to the street below. I could see lots people sat outside the bar eating dinner and enjoying a drink. The place was full of people just enjoying themselves.

    “At about 9.30pm a new looking black Mercedes pulled up outside with dark tinted windows at the back and the passenger and driver windows down. I could clearly see the passenger’s face as he was not *wearing a hat or mask. As soon as the car stopped he quietly opened the door and got out in front of the restaurant.

    “That is when I saw he was *holding a machine gun that was resting on his hip. I could not take in what I was witnessing. People outside spotted the shooter approaching with his gun and tried to run inside but he shot them down in the doorway. Then people inside moved *forward to see what was happening and he sprayed more bullets into them. I was trying to catch them on my camera phone but the gunman saw the light on my mobile and I ducked down behind the wall as they fired at my hotel. The gunman calmly reloaded his weapon several times. He then shot up at the windows in the street to make sure nobody was filming anything or taking photographs. It lasted over six minutes

    “He fired lots of bullets. He was white, clean shaven and had dark hair neatly trimmed. He was dressed all in black accept for a red scarf. The shooter was aged about 35 and had an extremely muscular build, which you could tell from the size of his arms. He looked like a weightlifter. He was not wearing gloves and his face was expressionless as he walked towards the bar. The driver had opened his door shortly before the shooting began and stood up with his arm and a machine gun rested on the roof of the car. He stood there with his foot up in the door acting as a lookout.

    I would describe him as tall, with dark hair and also quite muscular. They looked like soldiers or mercenaries and carried the whole thing out like a military operation. It was clear that they were both very heavily armed and the gunman was carrying several magazines on him. They both then coolly sat back in the car and sped off in the direction of the Bataclan Theatre.”

    Mr Admo added: “After about five minutes the police and ambulances arrived. There were about 20 bodies lying dead outside the bar and all the windows around were cracked from bullets. It was sickening. You could see where people had been shot. There were about eight ambulances to take injured survivors away. People were crying and screaming as they *began to realise what had happened. Around 5am the dead bodies were laid out in the street under yellow *blankets until they were taken away in ambulances.” Yesterday mourners *began laying flowers and candles in tribute to the dead outside the bullet-*ridden front of Le Belle Equipe.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts