Welcome to the Net Muslims Forums.
Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 328

Thread: Rehmet's Blog

  1. #41
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Ahmadinejad: Israeli Deja Vu all over again

    No other cult can beat the Zionists when it comes to the character assassination of their opponents. A Zionist leader or writer has the G-d-given right to call his fellow Jews by any dirty name without being called ‘anti-Semite’ – but the same rule has never been applied to the non-Jewish people – even though there could be 1000-times more Semite people among the non-Jews than the 13.5 million world Jewry.

    It seems Iranian President never stop receiving new titles from the Zionazi thugs. He has been called “religious fundamentalist (though he never studied at a religious institution. He has a PhD in Civil Engineering)”, “anti-Semite (though the Zionist Jews he criticize, are not Semitic people but Khazarian Turks)”, “the new Hitler”, “tyrant”, “prophet”, and “anti-West”. I guess the Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) goons have reached the bottom of their charater-assassination barrel now. Today, they have come with the most absurd allegation against Dr. Ahmadinejad.

    The British Daily Telegraph, a part of Zionist Jewish-controlled mainstream media has claimed that the reason for Iranian President’s criticism of Zionist regime and questioning the Zionist claim of “Six Million Died” – is due to his “Jewish roots”. The proof of the “Smoking Gun” is the ID card Dr. Ahmadinejad was holding during “election in March 2008″ (though he contested presidential election during June 2009). The Telegraph’s “experts” claimed that Ahmadinejad’s family converted to Islam after his birth and that his family name was “Sabourjian” – a Jewish name meaning “cloth-weaver”. In fact the family name in question was ‘Sabaghian” which in Persian language means “dye-masters” or “blacksmith” – that’s what Ahmadinejad’s father did for his livelihood. “Sabaghian” is not a Jewish surname.

    However, the joke is that if criticism of Jews makes one being having “Jewish roots” – then people like Jesus (his mother Mary was not from the tribe of Judah), King Constantine, Hitler (though some historians believe that his grandmother was a Jewish prostitute), Rev. Martin Luther, Nelson Mandela, Qadafi, David Duke, and every Holocaust revisionist must had a “Jewish mother” (a Jewish father alone doesn’t count in Talmudic racism).

    Dr. Ahmadinejad’s (born 1956) unfinished autobiography can be read here.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  2. #42
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Poll: Israel vs Hizb’Allah

    It’s over three years that the world’s fourth mighty army was humiliated at the hands of less than 2000 Lebanese Islamic resistance fighters with guns and mis-guided rockets. While Hizb’Allah and Lebanese are busy in the reconstruction of the infrastructure destroyed by Zionists’ indiscriminate 34-day bombardment – Israelis are still pre-occupied with to find out the reasons for their first military humilation at the hand a non-army group in its 61-year history.

    Some of the reasons they come up with are mostly absurd. For example, Tehran and Damascus supplied arms to Hizb’Allah (how about Washington donating billions of dollars of most modern arms to IOF for the last 50 years!); Hizb’Allah using civilians as ‘human shield’ (though according to Israeli sources, it was the Zionist entity which carried out such cowardly blending of Israeli Arab civilian with its military installations); Hizb’Allah conducts terrorist acts while Israel Army is one of world’s most moral forces (my foot, Franklin Lamb says); Israel did not have leaders with war experience (prime minister Olmert and the defence minister Peretz never held senior military command, while the Chief of Staff Maj.Gen. Dan Chalutz was a talking idiot), and many more lame excuses.

    The result of a POLL taken amongst Israeli military officers, reported by Major Dr. Ruby Sandman in the “Israeli” military magazine – paints a totally different views than the Israeli HASBARA goons want the world to believe. The poll says that the impression within the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) is that the performance of IOF was inferior to that of Hizb’Allah. Here is the breakdown:

    Intelligence: IOF (6 points) vs Hizb’Allah (7 points)
    Strategy: IOF (5 points) vs Hizb’Allah (9 points)
    Leadership: IOF (6 points) vs Hizb’Allah (8 points)
    Pursuit of outcome: IOF (4 points) vs Hizb’Allah (8 points)
    Control: IOF (8 points) vs Hizb’Allah (6 points)
    Human management: IOF (9 poits) vs Hizb’Allah (5 points)
    Supplies: IOF (8 points) vs Hizb’Allah (5 points)
    Weapons: IOF (8 points) vs Hizb’Allah (5 points)
    Rehab. & Reconstruction: IOF (7 points) vs Hizb’Allah (8 points)
    Technology: IOF (9 points) vs Hizb’Allah (5 points)

    Sandman writing in Israeli daily Maariv has warned the Zionist government that during the next round, Hizb’Allah will use thousands of “cells” each formed of four to five excellent infantry fighters, carrying medium-size machine guns and anti-tank rockets – and as soon as they enter Israeli-controlled Palestinian territory, they will receive support from the Native Palestinians. Sandman also warned the Zionist establishment to be prepared for the day when the US would not be there to protect the Zionist entity.

    Canada, the US and Israel are the only three countries in the world which have declared Hizb’Allah, an opposition party in Lebanese Parliament – as a terrorist organization. Hizb’Allah has 11 members in the 128- member Parliament.
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  3. #43
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Abbas agrees to sink Goldstone Report

    Al-Jazeera has reported that Hillary Clinton called Fatah leader Mahmud Abbas – to reject the UN Human Rights Council’s intention to put the report to vote on coming Friday. As the result, the ‘moderate’ PA president has backed ZOGs demand to postpone the vote till March next year. Clinton must have told Abbas that otherwise PA may lose its golden oppotunity to have a Palestinian ‘ghetto-state’ of its own - which it would need not to share with the Islamist Hamas.

    Hamas has agreed to investigate its its fighters’ conduct based on Goldstone reoprt. However, Tel Aviv has refused to probe into the conduct of its army, which is heavily criticized in the report (of its 31 chapters, only one is related to alleged war crimes by Hamas fighters).

    The human right groups and Palestinian resistance groups fear that the proposed postponement in the vote would let the Zionazi regime off the hook for its war crimes. Several Israeli military officials and politicians are sought in Spain for the 2002 assassination of Hamas commander Salah Shehadeh, and other European national courts for war crimes under the “Universal Jurisdiction”. Ironically, it was the Zionist regime which first invoked the “Universal Jurisdiction” when it kidnapped Zionazi chief Adolf Eichmann to be tried in Israel for war crimes. In 2005, a British judge issued warrant for the arrest of Israeli general Doron Almog for war crimes. In 2001, a Belgian court considered indictment of Ariel Sharon for his involvement in butchering thousands of Palestinian civilians at Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon.

    However, it could be quite hard to sink Goldstone report due to its impeccable credentials. For example, Richard Goldstone is a South African Jewish judge and is known for his close ties with the Zionist entity. He served as prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Goldstone’s associate, Hina Jilani, participated in the commission of inquiry for Darfur. Zionist entity and its supporters always complain that no one looks at other countries’ abuses. Well this team has.

    However, the past Israeli record shows that Zionist regime is not going to accept the findings of a “self-hating Goldstone Jew” without a fight. Shimon Peres called the report “made a mockery of history”. Bibi raised the Israeli objections with Obama’s special envoy George Mitchell – while his deputy foreign minister Daniel Ayalon whined to Susan Rice, Washington’s ambassador at the United Nations. All these meetings were meant to blackmail Obama administration to assist in curbing international fallout from Goldstone Commission Report.

    According to Hamas sources, Zionist regime is musing over another Gaza onslaught to terrorize 1.5 million Gazzan to weaken Hamas.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  4. #44
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default India’s famous separatists and terrorists

    On October 1, 2009 – Indian media reported Indian Air Force (IAF) Chief, Marshal P. V. Naik has sought permission from the Defense Ministry to use air-strike against the Maoist rebels (Naxalites) who operate inside 13 of India’s 28 states.

    On September 25, Indian Home Minister, P. Chidambaram told reporters in Chhattisgarh: “It’s a long drawn fight against Naxals (Maoists).”

    In April 2006, Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh called the Naxalite threat the “biggest internal security challenge ever faced by our country”. Which applies that Naxalite seperatists threat has surpassed Muslim resistance of last 60 years in Jammu and Kashmir who want to join next-door Azad Kashmir (an autonomous part of Pakistan).

    The “Naxalites” took their name after the district of Naxalbari in West Bengal, where the formers staged an uprising in 1967. Currently, they have become a nation-wide force. The have been greeted by China’s People’s Daily as Peal of Spring Thunder. They have maintained a close link to the powerful Maost group in the neighbouring Nepal – the only Hindu state (by Constitution) in the world.

    Since its birth (August 15, 1947) – India’s Hindu leaders have been blaming India’s neighbours (Pakistan, China, Burma, Sri Lanka, and Nepal) for backing-up the various ethnic groups fighting for independence from the central government in New Delhi. In order to reap political gains – The Hindu extremist groups have been targetting the Indian Muslim minority (140 million), Muslim-majority Pakistan (150 million) and Bangladesh (130 million) for their home-grown Hindu terrorism plus the CIA-Mossad engineered terrorism. For example, bombing of Mombai computer railway in July 2006 and as well as terrorist attack on India-Pakistan railwayline in February 2007 and Mumbai carnage on November 26, 2008.

    Naga people under the leadership of Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland has been at arm against New Delhi for decades. It’s secretary general, Thuingaleng Muivah, was reported saying: “Nagas have to go on fighting for their rights. This is a hard reality. So we have to go on resisting”.

    Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi played the role of midwife in the creation of Bangladesh (former East Pakistan) in 1971. However, since BJP government joined Israel in their fight against Muslim resistance movements in occupied Kashmir and Palestine – The Jewish-owned The New York Times (January 23, 2005) discovered that Al-Qaeda is about to carry-out The Next Islamist Revolution in Bangladesh. The Zionist-BJP mafia has even found a Mufti Amin Husseini (Palestine) look-alike in Bangladesh (former MP, Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini, who according to the writer of NYT article, Eliza Griswold, “he believes that secular law has failed in Bangladesh and that it’s time to implement Shariah, the legal code of Islam….” After this rant the writer jumps to the real Zionist agenda: “Communists are just one target of Islamic militants in Bangladesh. Most attacks have been carried out against either members of religious minorities – Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Ahmadiyya, and even moderate Muslims.”

    Muslim majority (80%) in the former princely state of Jammu and Kasmir have been fighting against the Hindu Raj since 1947 – when two-third of the state was occupied by the Indian Army. There are 600,000 Indian military personnel in Jammu and Kashmir to keep Muslim-majority terrorized through mass killing, torture and rape. More than 80,000 Muslim civilians have been killed by the Indian Army and Hindu extremist mobs since then.

    Three Indian states next to Burma and Bangladesh (Mizoram, Manipur and Nagaland) are being civilized through porn and drugs by our friendly neighborhood Israelis (estimated to be over 20,000) – while many Indian patriots believe that those three states are in the the process of being converted into thefuture second Jewish state.

    Shyam Chand, former minister of Hayrana state and author of Saffron Facism, wroe: “Not only is the nexus between RSS and Mossad worth investigation, our defense cooperation with Israel need reconsideration before the ominous shadow of Mossad falls over our defence forces.”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  5. #45
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Can Hamas be beaten?

    “Hamas can’t be beaten. Obviously President Obama shouldn’t join it, but he may have no choice to work with it…. President Obama can’t beat Hamas , but if he doesn’t act proactively, it can beat him,” – James Gundun in his research article,”If You Can’t Beat Hamas”, posted at The Trench on September 30, 2009.

    According to the Prophetic Traditions – The true Believers would never be deated but by the munafiqoon (hypocrites) within. An there has never been shortage of such back-stabbers in the Islamic history. The latest one is PA Guru Mahmoud Abbas. On October 1, Israel’s ambassador at Geneva, Aharon Leshno-Yaar admitted that he will never have enough votes to postpone debate on Goldstone Report at the UN Human Right Council. But then on the very next day, PA withdrew its resolution to adopt Goldstone’s recommendations (independent inquiries by both Israel and Hamas or the findings go to ICC). Now, I don’t have to explain why PA did it. Your guess is good as mine!!

    Reaction to PA treachery from pro-Palestinian resistance groups, as expected, was shear disappointment and furious. A senior member of democratically elected Hamas government, Mahmoud al-Zahar told Al-Jazeera: “He (Abbas) is encouraging Israeli military leaders to attack Gaza, to kill Hamas, and to kill people because they voted for Hamas, to postpone a very important report concerning the Israelis committing crimes against human-beings. He should resign and he should seek a fair trial. He is not representing any of the Palestinian people.”

    Thousands of Palestinians protested against PA betryal in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Thirty-two Palestinian groups in Europe too, called Abbas to step down from office immediately. Abbas’ prime minister Salam Fayyad and his planning minister Ali Jarbawi, both were reportedly ’surprised’ on Abbas’ consent to postpone the vote. Syria on its part has postponed Abbas’ scheduled visit to Damascus in protest.

    The joke is now Abbas is blaming his anti-Islamic Resistance – the western-puppet Arab and Muslim regimes – while they’re blaming him for the betryal.

    Interestingly, Israel’s vice-prime minister and strategic minister, Moshe Yaalon, has just postponed his visit to London – fearing that he maybe arrested for his involvement in the 2002 murder of 15 people including Hamas leader Salah Shehadeh, his wife and eight children by droping one tonne bomb in Gaza city.

    James Gundun wrote: “President Obama and Israel have no chance of marginalizing Hamas through wars, blockades, diplomatic exclusion, or military and economic support for the Fatah. Their only hope is advancing the peace process and robbing Hamas of its cause to resist. Otherwise stalled negotiations play right into Hamas’s hands, who is using the delay to reposition itself as a necessary component of Palestinian statehood and champion the resistance in the face of Israeli obstinacy.”

    And then James Gudun concludes: ”Herein lie President Obama’s choices. He can continue to let Israel act unilaterally and with impunity in the West Bank and Gaza – and risk a Third Intifada. He can continue to let Israel dominate the peace process and control who America negotiates with – and risk a Third Intifada. The path least headed towards a Third Intifada is objective handling of Israel and engagement with Hamas, ironic as that may seem to America. 2010 could catapult Hamas back into the West Bank and the peace process, at which point exclusion will no longer be possible.”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  6. #46
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Bolton: Iran scored big victory in Geneva

    Writing for the Jewish ‘Wall Street Journal’ (October 5, 2009) – former USrael ambassador at UN, John Bolton, said: ”The agreement constitutes another in the long string Iranian negotiating victories over the West.”

    John Bolton was commenting on Iranian nuclear experts’ meeting with the ‘five chosen ones’ among the 15-member UN Security Council, known as P5+1 (the US, Russia, France, Britain, China) and Germany – on October 1, 2009 in Geneva to discuss the Israel’s propsed new “crippling sanctions” against Islamic Iran.

    Henry Sokolski, the “nuclear expert”, whined in the pro-Israel National Review – that US administration and its P5+1 partners had “blinked by dropping any hint of penalizing Tehran and letting it continue to make nuclear fuel at Natanz”.

    On the other hand, Obama and other ZOG leaders of P5+1 have hailed the meeting as “a break-through”. The Iranian delegation has agreed not only to allow AIEA to inspect its second uranium-enrichment facility near Qom – but also to ship (in principle) most of its enriched uranium from its Natanz facility to Russia and France for processing into fuel for its reactor that makes isotopes for nuclear medicine for cancer treatment.

    Many experts in the Middle East believe that if Iran began shipping its enriched-nuclear material to Russia and Frnace (details to be worked out during next IAEA meeting October 18 in Vienna – the regional tensions stoked by repeated Tel Aviv’s threats to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities would subside. This would offer more time for negotiations to build greater trust between Islamic Iran and its ZOG interlocutor. Furthermore, the on-going negotiations should act as a counter-balance to Israel and its Jewish Lobby groups in the US and EU – calling for “crippling sanctions” to be imposed against Islamic-regime in Tehran may fade, which the Zionist thugs are really affraid of.

    In September 2009 – Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, stated in India that there are 30 countries which use nuclear technology in medical research – but none of them – as signatory to NPT – has been required to follow ZOGs dictate.

    “Every country has the right to add nuclear power to its energy mix, as well as a duty to do it responsibly. That means adhering to highest safety and security standards and ensuring that nuclear material is not diverted from peaceful to military purposes,” – The IAEA Chief told his Indian audience – the very country which not only possesses over 100 nuclear bombs but along with its ‘partner in terrorism’ (Israel) refuses to sign NPT. However, that doesn’t bother P5+1 – because India is not a Muslim country and it doesn’t call for the removal of Zionist-regime from the occupied Palestine.

    Canada, not long ago, was world’s top nuclear-isotope supplier – from AECL facility at Chalk River (near Ottawa).

    The world has passed the stage when the western colonial powers had monopoly over nuclear field for their military usage. Now, nuclear technology is becoming increasingly, a tool for the production of cheap and much safer power generation – in addition to its applications in cancer treatment, high-yielding food crops, and maintaining supplies of fresh water.

    This week’s results of the poll from the Pew Research Center for the people and the press – showed that 63% of the 1500 Americans who participated in the poll approved the US “negotiating direct with Iran over the issue of its nuclear program”.

    On October 5, The Jerusalem Post reported that Israel’s top gun, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, secretly flew to France on October 4 – where he held talks with America’s top gun, Admiral Michael Mullen and the French top gun, General Jean-Louis. The agenda was, naturally, Hamas, Hizb’Allah and Islamic Iran. The Zionazi clown told them that a nuclear armed Iran is “threat to the entire world”. However, the French General told the Zionist mafia last month: “military intervention was not a viable option to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear capability”. He also added that a “military strike was too risky”.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  7. #47
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default US-Israel-SA: “Axis of Evil” in Nigeria

    Last month Nigerians held Al-Quds Day rallies (September 18) in support of Palestinian resistance against Jewish occupation of Palestine in several cities – with largest in Zaria. Before the rally, the Nigerian security establishment hatched a plan with the help of US embassy in Abuja and Israelis to bomb the home of Sheikh Ibrahim Yaqub Zakzaky and use Saudi-funded sectarian mullahs’ “fatwas” against holding the rally – as being an Iranian propaganda ploy.

    Sheikh Zakzaky is the leader of Islamic movement in Nigeria and the top pro-Palestinian Islamic scholar in Nigeria – in which Muslims make a slight majority (50%) followed by Christians (40%) and others (10%).

    Yusuf Dhia-Allah in his article titled “Islamic movement leader in Nigera targeted” – published in the October 2009 issue of the Crescent International – wrote:

    “Details of the plot indicate that in addition to American and Israeli involvement, it also had the backing of the Saudis whose paid preachers are scattered throughout the country.Nigerian security operatives had met in Abuja, the country’s capital, in early September to put final touches to the plot. Part of it included unleashing a wave of denunciations of Shaykh Zakzaky and his followers by Saudi-funded “ulama” who would brand his group “heretics (Shias)”. This is an old ploy used against people that the regime wishes to target. The attack plan was concentrated in Zaria where the largest Quds Day rally takes place each year (since 1980s) although such rallies are held in other states – Kano, Katsina and Delta – as well.

    Unlike the past when groups were instigated to attack Shaykh Zakzaky’s movement, this time the security forces were to carry out massacre themselves. Additionally, plans had been prepared to take members of the movement into the bush before executing them. This would avoid arousing sympathy for them if people saw the brutal tactics of the security forces….”

    As part of the phoney “war on terrorism” – in which any pro-Palestinian, pro-Iranian Muslim scholar, automatically becomes the target of Zionist mafia. According to Yusuf Dhia-Allah: “In Nigeria, the Zionists are also very active. Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, a well-known racist, had only a few weeks earlier visited Nigeria.The visit was presented as part of an agreement on agricultural and technological cooperation between the two countries but it also included a security pact whereby Israel would not only train Nigerian security personnel but also directly involved in local security operations. The plot to assassinate Shaykh Zakzaky coming within days of Lieberman’s visit could not be more revealing especially in view of his racist views and hatred of Islamic activists.”

    In his address at the Al-Quds rally – Shaykh Zakzaky repeated his movement’s solidarity with the oppressed people of occupied Palestine and advised the Nigerian Muslims to remain stead-fast and not be cowed down by the Zionazi terrorism against them.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  8. #48
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Ahmadinejad – From “Jewish” to “Taliban supporter”

    There is no limit to how low Israel and its Zionist supporters would stoop in Ahmadinejad’s character assassination. The Zionist entity’s anti-Muslim mafia has become so paranoid as result of some recent humiliation from Ahmadinejad’s speech at conference on Racism, UN General Assembly session 2009, and P5+1 meeting in Geneva – that its latest Hasbara ‘findings’ are not only ridiculous but down-right lies – as Ahmadinejad being called an anti-Semite in 2005 – for mentioning the historical fact – that since Jewish genocide was committed by Europeans – in fairness, Jews should have been given a homeland in Europe – and that Palestinians should not be made to pay for others’ crimes.

    On October 3, British Jewish Daily Telegraph, dropped the ‘bomb-shell’ – claiming that Ahmadine’s hatred toward Israel comes from his being born into a Jewish family.Interestingly, I beat Dr. Ahmadinejad in that category, because a few years ago, some idiots posted my CV on several websites – claiming that the reason “Rehmat hate Jews, because his mother was Jewish, but he converted to Islam.” One moron by the name Kenneth even posted a spam on this blog, entitled: “Rehmat has converted to Judaism – you should too”.

    On October 7 – Talking on CBS News – Lara Logan, quoted the former CIA official Bruce Riedel saying: “It’s clear that US-Iranian relations now are going to go into increasing difficult period. If I was sitting in Tehran, I would be looking for the place where you could hurt the Americans the most and that’s Obama’s war right next door in Afghanistan”.

    Now, one wonder why this idiot who was part of the team, which reviewed Obama administration policy toward Afghanistan and Pakistan, completed in March 2009 – forgot that ‘while he was sitting in Tehran, the better place to hurt Americans would be Iraq and not Afghanistan’. And I, for one, can cite many reasons for that:

    1. Pushun-speaking Taliban and the great majority of Persian-speaking Afghans are Sunnis – while Shias makes less than 10% of the total Afganistan population of over 20 million. Contrary to that – Shias make close to 60% of Iraqi population. Most of leading Shia cleric were educated in Iran and some of them live in exile in Iran for decades.

    2. Israelis are quite active in both Iraq and Afghanistan. In Afghanistan with the cooperating of Indian intelligence agency RAW – they run military training camps for the Al-Qaeda fighting against Pakistan military.

    Bruce Riedel is associated with Zionist think tanks, Brookings Institute and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In his August 10 artitle in Brookings, The Next Terror Target, the Islamophobe – after the murder of Baitullah Mehsud in a US air strike – suggested: “The next key target for the US: Mullah Muhammad Omar, a far more elusive and important player, who has lead the Taliban’s resurgence in Afghanistan from hidding in Pakistan. Under his leadership, the Afghan Taliban has returned from near total defeat in 2001 to threaten the survival of NATO effort in Afganistan and indeed the future of the alliance.”

    I bet Bruce knew that Baitullah Mehsud was not working for Mullah Omar but was a Zionist collaborator, whose operation in Swat Valley was funded by MOSSAD and RAW.

    On October 2, CFR published an interview with professor John W. Limbert (US Naval Academy) in which the professor was quoted as reated the popular HASBARA (Zionist propaganda) lies: “You’ve had the “‘axis of evil” speech by President George W. Bush in 2002 right after we seemed to be making progress with Iran over Afghanistan. Then you had Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and some of his more outrageous rhetoric starting in 2005 about the holocaust and Israel; then you had this fishy election. If you let any of these things derail the process then you’ll never get anywhere.”

    Dr. Ahmadinejad never questioned the Jewish sufferings under Nazi regime (a collaboration of Christian and Jew racists) – but he asked for an international review Zionists’ numbers (six million). Dr. Ahmadinejad did not call for the destruction of the state of Israel but the elimination of the racist anti-Arab Zionist regime in Israel. The “Green Revolution” was funded by Washington to the tune of US$400 million – in order to defeat Ahmadinejad and install someone who is not critical of Zionist regime or pro-Hamas.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  9. #49
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Armenia’s forgotten holocaust

    Yesterday, Ankara and Yerevan inked a friendship protocol in Zurich – closing a century-old chapter in Turkish-Armenian enemity over the last century’s first holocaust in which estimated 1.5 million Armenian Christians were killed by the Crypto-Jewish leaders of the Turkish Army.

    Turkish President Abdullah Gul, Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian and the ‘Israel-First’ Hillary Clinton are expected to attend the signing of the ”historic reconcilliation deal” – which will open the way for a diplomatic ties, and opening the borders which have been sealed for a decade. Both Turkey and Armenia are expected to benefit from this deal – in political and economic fields.

    Ironically, Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama – during their election campaign promised the one million US-Armenian citizens that if elected – they would recognize the Armenian genocide as “holocaust” – but the citizens were reminded by the Israeli lobby, ADL’s president Abraham Foxman that the word “Holocaust” is reserved for the Jewish mass-killings. only. Abe even refused to accept Armenian tragedy as ‘genocide’ – resulting in several Jewish leaders demanded that he should step-down as the head of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Abe cooperated with Kemalist Army in 2007 to kill the ‘Armenian Genocide Bill’ in the Congress to hide Jewish involvement in this WW I ‘false flage’ operation for which Turk Muslims are being blamed till today.

    President Obama shed crocodile tears while attending Jewish holocaust memorial ceremonies in April 2009 – but did not mention the Palestinian Holocaust carried out by the Zionazi state just a few months earlier. Obama just became the third US President to receive Nobel Peace Prize for serving the cause of Israel.

    Mevlan Zadeh Rifat in his book Inner Folds of the Ottomon Revolution (1929) wrote: “Armenian genocide was decided in August 1910 and October 1911, by a Young Turk committee composed entirely of displaced Balkan Jews in the format of a syncretist Jewish-Muslim sect which included Talaat, Enver, Behaeddin Shakir, Jamal and Nizam posing as Muslims. It met in the Rothschild-funded Grand Orient Hotel on Salonika.”

    Joseph Brewda of Schiller Institute in his 1994 research paper titled Palmerson launches Young Turks to permanently control Middle East, wrote that a Jew by the name Emmanuel Carasso, the Grand Master of Italian Masonic Lodge Macedonia Resurrected – established the Young Turk movement in Salonika in the 1890s.
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  10. #50
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Obama: Nobel Prize but no Peace

    On October 9 – Barack Obama beat the other two US presidents who received Nobel Peace Prize just being in the White House womb for nine months without achieving peace in any of the foreign lands occupied by the US or its Zionist allies. The other two Presidents who received Nobel Peace Prize while waging wars for corporate lobby groups – were Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt. What Obama and Roosevelt has common in addition to Nobel Prize – is that both have Jewish blood – though Zionists like us to believe that Iranian President Ahmadinejad, too, has Jewish roots.

    The other US Presidents, who did not receive the coveted prize -but are rumoured to be Jewish – include Abraham Lincoln (son of Nancy Hakenburger), Franklin D. Roosevelt (son of Dutch Jewish family by the name Rosefelt), Harry Truman, Eisenhower (son of a Swedish Jewish family), Lyndon Johnson, Bushes (good Nazi connections), etc.

    Hebrew media did boast that it were Jews who put Obama in the White House and that “he is one of us”. Henry Makow PhD, a Canadian academic, in his October 7 article titled Obama\’s Jewish Grandfather wrote that Barack Husein Obama’s maternal grandfather, Stanely Dunhum, was Jewish. He also repeat his earlier allegations that Hitler’s grandmother was also Jewish (a Rothschild).

    Raja Chemayel in his article, titled Pissing on Peace prizes!!!, said it all:

    “Obama gets a Nobel Peace Prize what for??

    He just got in!! This is premature delivery!!!

    Is this prize for his speech in Cairo

    in front of a hand-picked selected audience

    Or just because….. he has the same sun-tan as Martin Luther King??

    Is this prize for admitting that Bush got in Iraq

    What Saddam Hussein has promised us, long before the invasion.

    Is this prize for offering medical-help security

    in the richest society on this planet??

    Is it for bombing civilians in Kandahar?

    I don’t know!!

    But I suspect that this prize is exclusively as a reward

    for failing to stop even illegal buildings…in Palestine.

    For failing to reign in a wild-dog-Netanyahu??

    Why should I bother writing any satire… anymore

    When Henry Kissinger got the same prize

    And Itzhak Rabin too.

    Good night!!

    I am going to bed early.”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  11. #51
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Moroland: Muslims’ struggle for survival

    According to the latest report from Geneva-based Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) - 950,000 people have been displace in Muslim-majority island of Mindanao between August 2008 and September 2009. The plight of these refugees (mostly Muslims) in the war-torn South are totally ignored by the world media while attention is focussed on thousands of Pilipinos (mostly Christians) up North who have been forced to evacuate because of typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng.

    The US, not only, is training Phillipines Army but Marines are fighting along Pilipino soldiers against Muslim resistant groups which have been struggling for independece from Manila. This was confirmed by Senate Defense Committee Rodolfo Baizon, who tabled Senate Resolution 1370 – calling for the withdrawal of US troops out of “conflict or combat-prone areas” – Sulu, Basilan and Central Mindanao.

    Phillipines president, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in her July 27, 2009 State of Nation Address said: “We inherited an old-age conflict in Mindanao, exacerbated by a political popular but near-sighted policy of massive retaliation. This only provoked the other side to continue the war.” Even then she has been maintaining the Marcos’ trany against Muslim minority. Moshe Obama performed a similar act in Cairo while continuing Bush’s “War on Islam”.

    The ‘Moroland’ consists of Mindanao, the second largest island within Phillipines, along with Sulu, Palawan, Basilan and neighboring islands – are home to over 12 million Muslims (out the total population of 20 millions). Islam came to Moroland in 1210 CE through Muslim Arab traders - 300 years ahead of Christianity brought by Portuguese invaders in 1521 CE. For more than three centuries the Spanish Christians tried to eradicate Islam from Moroland, followed by forty-seven years of American occupation and destruction of Islamic identity. In 1946, while ending American occupation – Washington, against the wishes of the Muslim-majority – awarded Moroland to Christian Phillipine in exchange for US military bases.

    Below is part of address delivered by former Senator Santanina T. Rasul at Women’s Federation for World Peace at the Manila Hotel on February 12, 1999:

    “Muslims see a wide gap between theory and practice of (Manila)government as far as they’re concerned. The threat to the future of Islam has created fear of identity loss because of perceived effects of unabated and near monopolistic use of power for the benefit of interests not sympathetic to Islam or Muslims.

    From the centuries of Islamic revolution we see the remarkable capacity of Islam and the Muslim people to survive the tremendous changes that had come from colonial conquests and pacification. We see this ability to survive as being attributed to both the nature of Islam and the variety of responses generated to outside forces. It is these responses that the legacy of Islam can be seen and therefore identified. There are three contributions that maybe said to constitute the historical legacy of Islam to the Philippines and Filipino people.

    1. We learn from our history that long before Filipinism was developed as a basis of national unity the Muslims had already developed a national consciousness based on the Islamic concept of ummah. It was unity based on the total integration of all aspects of society. It transcended the barriers of ethnic, social, economic or other personal differences.

    The four centuries of bloody confrontation with colonialism illustrate the Muslims’ persistent struggle against injustice. The discriminatory policies of Spanish colonialism were responsible for keeping the Muslims in continuous resistance. It was Islam that enabled the Muslims to resist with continuing persistence. Islam instilled values that abhorred injustice against individuals as well as society. In fact “fik sabilillah” best expresses the Muslim struggle against all kinds of injustice.

    Contrary to the stereotyped perception that Muslims are violent, Islam teaches peace. In fact, Islam means submission to the will of God who is the author of real and lasting peace. But history tells us that the Islamic concept of peace is one that is not imposed through coercion but rather comes from the fulfillment of justice. This explains why treaties entered into between Spain and the Muslims could not have brought the peace the Muslims desired because it was based on injustice and coercion.

    If we are to accept the pattern of history, Islam must be recognized as a positive factor or force in the pursuit of peace and unity by the State. The sooner the nation and the government recognize this fact the better is it for the future of the country as a whole. We must continue to destroy the prejudices of the past and begin to remake the history of the Filipino people without the social barriers that tend to divide us.”

    Manila is the capital city of Philippines and the second most populated city. The city name either comes from Tagalog word Maynilad (meaning ‘place of mangroves’) or Arabic word Amanillah (meaning ‘under the protection of Allah’). There are several other thing which remind the visitors of the Islamic past of this region.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  12. #52
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Hindu terrorism against Indian Muslims

    “Muslim youths with no criminal records are picked up by illegally by the policemen in plainclothes and taken to farmhouse etc. and kept for days on end and tortured brutally…,” – Harsh Mander, a former Indian bureaucrat – reported by India’s daily The Hindu.

    ANHAD (meaning ‘without limits’) is an Indian activist group dedicated for a ‘Secular India’ – whose members have been beaten-up by Hindutva hoodlums several times. ANHAD organized a National Meet on the ‘Status of Muslims’ on October 3-5 in New Delhi – to document the continuing ways of discrimination, exclusion, persecution of Muslims (over 140 million) in India today. The panel of the moot consisted of 21 Hindu-Muslim-Christian secular intellectuals and anti-communalism activists. More than three dozen speakers, representing India’s diverse religious communities, address the three-day conference.

    The jury members after studying the submissions, which include complaints like discrimination in matters of renting houses in non-Muslim dominated areas, prejudices and biases of public institutions against Muslims and reinforcing stereotypes by the media also recommended the enactment of the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation of Victims) Bill with changes suggested by the civil society groups.

    “Strong action should be taken under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code against organisations which indulge in hate campaigns and communal propaganda. The requirement of prior sanction of the State government before a complaint is registered under this Act should be waived,” the recommendations state.

    At the end of the conference, the panelists demanded that “Indian government appoint a high-powered judicial commission headed by a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to examine all cases of terror across the country”.

    Ram Puniyani, one of the panelists, reviewed the conference under the heading Is it A Crime To Be Born A Muslim In India?:

    “The myths and stereotypes in the media and social space are very much there. The large section of school text-books reinforce the stereotypes and myths about the community. So where this all lead us? In a democracy, in a secular state the minorities should be provided safety and dignity irrespective of their religion. The present condition of Muslims in India is nothing but abysmal from the point of view of security, econonmic condition and social life. A large section has started feeling the deprivations in a very painful manner.

    One recalls under the domination of Brahamanical values, caste based exclusionary social-political-solution, the caste of Shudras was systematically denied the life of dignity and made to live in subjugation and ghettoization. The efforts of ‘Brahmanical ideology based politics’, the one of RSS and its progeny, is achieving the same pattern with some difference. Now Muslims are being reduced to second class citizen. This precisely what RSS wants, this what is coming to be practised at all the levels in the country. RSS progeny being in power or out of it doesn’t matter as far as the life of Muslim community is concerned. The RSS and its ideology have infiltrated the ’social common sense’ through media and education. It has infiltrated the state machinery. The limit of this can be seen that RSS controlled Bhonsla Military School in Nasik is supplying large number of recruits for Indian Army, one of them being Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit (with Mossad links), an accomplice of Pragya Singh Thakur, alleged culprits of Malegaon blast. If RSS, a fascist organization wrapping its politics in the cloak of Hindu religion, swaymsevaks can infiltrate army which institution in this society is safe from slow communal fascist infiltration? Which institution can be trusted for upholding Indian Constitution?

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  13. #53
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Afghanistan: ‘Get Out Now’

    “By ending the Afghan war, quickly and decisively, the President (Obama) will match his rhetoric of home with reality. He will also save US lives and create new openings for negotiations,” – G. Pascal Zachary, Editor In These Times magazine, in ’Get Out Now’

    “Listen to us Mr. President, here is your trophy, once you accept it you may have to say NO to your Ziocons at home, for people with a peace medal cannot launch wars”. Obama may have to find other policies to pursue peace rather than killing Muslims. Time will tell whether the Nobel Committee gamble justified itself…” – Gilad Atzmon in The Nobel Prize, the Brand and the President – Imprisoned by the most dangerous Zionist guards.

    Barack Obama following the Israeli maxim: “If force doesn’t work, use more force,” Uri Avnery - announced early to send additional 40,000 soldiers to help the current 60,000 American soldiers, who have been dying (over 4,200 dead and 35,000 wounded) for oil and opium war in Afghanistan. Lately, more and more Americans are seeing this eight-year adventure turning into a new Vietnam-style-guagmire, which would result in American defeat at the end.

    However, the Sayanim (Jewish tribal operators who happen to work for Mossad or serve Israeli and Zionist interests) such as vice-president Joseph Biden and Senator John Kerry are advocating for a slow-motion (limited) war – which will allow the US and NATO forces to stay there and keep that part of the Muslim world (Pakistan, Islamic Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, etc.) in turmoil for an infinite period of time. This is based on the Zionist General Stanely McChrystal’s report to Obama’s ‘war room’ – in which he blamed both Pakistan’s ISI and Iran’s Qods Force -for American and NATO military set-backs in Afghanistan.

    Former ISI Chief, Lt. Gen. Hamid Gul, in an interview with Zionist think tank ‘Foreign Policy Journal’ (August 12, 2009) put the reason for American invasion of Afghanistan – not to destroy Al-Qaeda or capture Osama Bin Laden – but to reach Central Asian oilfield, to counter Chinese influence in the region, to undo Taliban regime because they introduced Shari’ah, destroy Pakistan’s nuclear capability which is considered a great threat by both Tel Aviv and New Delhi and most importantly to provide a wider security shield to the state of Israel (The Greater Middle East).

    The General also predicted that no matter how many more American forces are dumped into this bottomless pit – America cannot win the war because its Generals lack the moral courage to tell the truth to US politicians. A morally bankrupt military leadership cannot achieve a real victory.
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  14. #54
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Nuclear proliferation and Western hypocrisy

    I must admit that I usually get a laugh, every time I happen to read the so-called ‘research’ articles on the website of America’s most powerful Jewish-controlled think tank, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). They’re, usually, nothing but Israeli HASBARA (propaganda) crap. The one I am going to address is an interview with another “expert on Middle Eastern Affairs”, Dr. Joseph S. Nye Jr. (Harvard University) – published one day before the P5+1 meeting with Iran’s nuclear officials on October 1, 2009. The title of the interview ‘The Right’ to Question Iran, shows the historical ignorance and political cunningness of CFR.

    The good professor was quoted of the opinion that he doesn’t expect any major breakthroughs from the talks, Washington nonetheless has the responsiblity the push Iran to come clean. “If the Iranian develope nuclear weapons, there’s likely to be a chain of proliferation in the Middle East. This may make the prospect of nuclear weapons being used go up by a significant propability. We have a right, as do their neighbors, to try to pursuade them to forgo that.”

    I bet the Professor cannot be so ignorant of the fact that Zionist entity had developed nuclear bombs over four decades ago and on several ocassion its leader had threatened to use them against its Arab neighbors. However, that did not start proliferation in the Middle East – though some of Arab neighbors did question the Israel’s right to develop them. Moreover, Washington, never used ‘The Right’ to Question Israel.

    Interestingly, another American professor, Christopher Vasillopulos (Eastern Connecticut State University), has thrown eggs on CFR propaganda piece. Writing under the heading Obama and Palestine: Predictable disappointment, publish in Turkish daily “Today’s Zaman”:

    Every time Obama or Hillary Clinton refer to the unacceptability of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, they refer to non-existent Iranian weapons and ignore hundreds of Israeli nuclear warheads. The American mantra reconfirmed by Obama-Clinton is “no nuclear weapons in the Middle East”. Who can disagree with this? Who want nuclear weapons in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter? The difficulty with the American mantra could not be more simple or compelling. It is false in its premises and false in the facts. Americans have accepted nuclear weapons in the Middle East, so long as they are Israelis. And Israel had nuclear weapons for over thirty years, hundreds of war loads and missile capable of reaching every capital in the region. Every time an American official intones the mantra that “nuclear weapons are unacceptable in the region”, the hypocrisy bell clangs. Therefore, my critical indicator of change in American policy regarding Palestine is this: Would Obama say that all nuclear weapons in the Middle East are unacceptable, including those of Israel? So far there has been a resounding silence, except the hypocrisy bell. Clang! Clang!”

    There is a much greater problem entailed in the mantra than a flagrant double standard. The very stability of the region, one of the principal objectives of American foreign policy, is being held hostage to this absurd mantra. So long as Israeli nuclear weapons are ignored, there can be no nuclear stability in the region. As every nuclear strategist knows, it is inherently unstable for only one adversary to have nuclear weapons. Nuclear deterrence, that is, nuclear stability, requires mutually assured destruction (MAD). This doctrine holds that stability requires that each nuclear power has the ability to retaliate effectively after the most devastating attack possible. This is called “second strike capability.” To be effective, it must inflict unacceptable damage to the nation which struck first. This has been the logic of nuclear stability ever since the Soviet Union developed its ability to strike the US. Its only assumption is the belief in the sanity of those who hold the nuclear triggers. Like it or not, precarious or not, MAD has worked. There is no reason to believe its fundamental logic no longer applies. It has applied regionally as well, as the case of India and Pakistan demonstrates.

    Of course, the assumption of sanity is properly called into question by religious and other fanatics. No one wants such true believers to have control of nuclear weapons. “Aha! Therefore, we have to stop the Iranians!” The problem with this corollary of the American mantra is that it ignores Israeli fanatics, who are more firmly in control of Israel and its nuclear weapons than Islamic fundamentalists are in control of Iran and its non-existent nuclear weapons. No one doubts that Israel would use nuclear weapons on the Arabs, whether or not they have been attacked with such weapons. Everyone fears that Israel, rather than be defeated, would resort to nuclear Armageddon. Indeed this is one of the principal reasons that America does all it can to avoid an Israeli defeat. To the degree this is true, American foreign policy is held hostage to the existence of the Israeli monopoly of nuclear weapons, a fortiori, when Israel is controlled by right-wing fanatics, as is the current case…….

    I am compelled to warn that the next time we hear Obama intone the mantra that “nuclear weapons in the Middle East are unacceptable,” we should hear more than the “clang! clang!” of hypocrisy. We should hear the bell sounding the knell of political rationality. And what will take its place, if not the irrational forces of hatred, bigotry, racism and fanaticism?

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  15. #55
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Movie “Lebanon” – Israel’s Vietnam

    Lebanon (see a short video at the end of the post) is the latest Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) movie – like the movie Tel Aviv, shown at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). Lebanon movie is based on the real story of four Israel Occupation Force (IOF) soldiers hidding inside a US donated tank – which was sent to shell a Lebanese village – but got trapped behind the Syrian lines during 1982 invasion of Lebanon – worried more to survive than to shell the village civilians. The invasion ended with the masacre at the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila , expulsion of Fatah fighters including Yasar Arafat and occupation of Southern Lebanon, the source of Litani River, which was ‘jewel’ for which Ariel Sharon sold the war to Israeli public (later the Israeli press gave it the code name “Israel’s Vietnam”) – promising a “swift victory”. But that “victory” lie paved the ground for the emergence of Islamic Resistance, Hizb’Allah, a few year later. Hizb’Allah freedom-fighters waged a guerilla war for 18-year and forced the IOF to withdraw from most of Southern Lebanon in 2000 – then in 2006, HizbAllah gave a crushing military defeat in 34-day war in which 30,000 IOF soldeirs took part during the last days of the war.

    Last week the movie Lebanon won the top prize at Venice International Film Festival. The film is produced by David Silber and is written and directed by Samuel Maoz (one of the four terrified IOF fully-armed thugs in the tank).

    “The films (like Beaufort, Waltz with Bashir, etc.) are the continuation of the feeling that Israel is the victim in the Middle East conflict. They act as a salve against charges that we are war criminals,” Meir Schnitzer wrote in his review of the movie in Israel’s daily Ma’ariv.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  16. #56
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default The “Holocaust” – Myths and Facts

    Could it be a coincident that I found three different writers (a Muslimah, a Jewess, and a Christian) writing on the topic of Holocaust during the past two weeks. Nahida Izzat wrote About Anti-Semitism, Mary Rizzo wrote a response to Nahida in Care and Feeding of the Holocaust Elephant in Room (spiced up by Ahmadinejad), and Michael K. Smith in Cloning of Holocaust. I have read the writings of the first two and respect their views – but this is the first time I have read Michael, whose article I find very informative.

    Now, before I comment on those three articles – let me state that the genocide of European did happen at the hands of Nazi regime – but the largest numbers of Nazi victims were Gypsies followed by Christians, which are totally ignored in Zionist narrative of the Holocaust.

    One important historically fact which all the three writers ignored (denying of which is very crucial to the survival of the Holocuat industry) – is that a large numbers of European Jews did played a significant role (based on the Jewish population in Europe) in the genocide of Gypsies, Christians and the Jews. Jews were Hitler’s confidents in his private life, Nazis regime, Nazi Army and the concentration camps. Zionist Chaim Kaplan wrote in his diary (The Scrolls of Agony) during the Warsaw ghetto uprising: “Every nation, in its time of misfortune, has conspirators who do their work in secret. In our case an entire nation has been raised on conspiracy. With others the conspiracy is political; with us it is religious and national.”

    When Nahida said: “We Palestinians do not have any responsibility whatsoever for the crimes of the holocaust, nor we do carry the burden of European racism against Jewish people” – She is not the first person to say that. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, as the first Governor General said that in 1947 – so did India’s US representative, Krishna Menon in 1948; Imam Khomeini in 1980s, French politician and author Roger Garaudy, and Ahmadinejad now.

    It’s not Ahmadinejad who is “spicing up the holocaust”, but Mary Rizzo, who has spicing up Israeli hate propaganda against Dr. Ahmadinejad. He is not saying something different than what Nahida and others have said in the past or the Torah Jews are saying about Israel and the “Six Million Died” narrative. Even if Ahmadinejad stop questioning the Zionist narrative of the ‘holocaust’ and stop calling the removal of racist Zionist regime – the Israelis would find some other excuse to demonize Ahmadinejad. It’s not Ahmadinejad whom the Zionist mafia hate – but Islam – as Israeli Professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi confirmed in his famous book The Israeli Connection and Jonathan Marshall’s The Iran Contra Connection.

    YES – Don’t ever get foold by Israeli propaganda that Israel is a ‘Jewish State’. In fact it is a Racist Marxist State.

    Michael K. Smith’s satirical article goes like this:

    With the WWII generation rapidly passing into history, custodians of the official Holocaust narrative have concluded that the only way to preserve the extermination legend is to clone the remaining Holocaust martyrs while time still permits.

    Proponents of the extermination thesis have long worried that the death of eyewitnesses to the Holocaust will cast undue attention on the lack of forensic evidence for mega-gas-chambers, calling into question how an assembly line of extermination could have existed without leaving behind material and documentary evidence. The temporary solution of intimidating the public with an avalanche of tear-jerking stories has the defect of depending on mortal eyewitnesses whose testimony necessarily loses dramatic impact upon their deaths. The “final solution” was hit upon last year by Dr. Avigdor Leibowitz at a conference of Cloners For Social Responsibility, where he proposed to “keep guilt alive” by mass producing key eyewitnesses in perpetuity, thus immortalizing exterminationist gas chambers and Holocaust martyrdom. The ambitious project is slated to kick off in just a few days with the cloning of Auschwitz survivor Elie Wiesel, who has called the effort to extend his melancholic existence unto eternity, “the thrill of my life.”

    Authorization for the first run of Wiesels has been issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, which, citing the Endangered Species Act, says 500 Wiesels are needed immediately to preserve a gas chamber legend facing extinction at the hands of an unprecedented upsurge in rational skepticism throughout the world. The situation is now widely seen to be critical, with the board of directors of the Jewish Institute of Holocaust Addicted Dogmatists (JIHAD) determining that cloned Wiesels and Holocaust museums must become as common as ATM machines, in order to hold off the rising tide of “hate speech” viciously asking for Holocaust martyrs to substantiate their factual claims.

    The Wiesel clones are scheduled for international speaking tours for the next fifty years, with the revenue generated by their speeches earmarked for settlement expansion in Israel. Related plans to clone Ariel Sharon to solve the Palestinian problem are still in the planning stages, but non-partisan AIPAC lobbyists insist these efforts will soon usher in permanent Middle East peace…..

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  17. #57
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Ayrilik (Farewell) Israel

    Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan did not give Bibi much time to enjoy his victory at the UN in blocking the debate on Gladstone’s anti-Semitic report. On October 11, Ankara barred Israel from joining NATO-sponsored US-Israel-Turkey-Italy joint Air Force excersises in Turkey. In protest, both ZOGs in the US and Italy refused to attend the drill and as the result – NATO postponed the drill. To add salt to this insult, Turkish TV Channel TRT 1 aired Ayrilik (Farewell), a prime time show the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) soldiers as sadists who murder Palestinian children with deliberate premeditation.

    One scene shows a soldier approaching a Palestinian girl as she stands with her back against a wall in an alley of what looks like a West Bank city. The actor playing the soldier slowly raises his gun, looks intently at the innocently smiling girl, and then shoots her in the chest from just metres away.

    Another scene shows Israeli soldiers killing a baby at a roadblock. Yet another shows a bullet in slow motion chasing a small boy fleeing as soldiers disperse a demonstration with live ammunition. The bullet then hits him in the back, and he falls to the ground.

    Irritated Israeli racist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that “broadcasting this series is incitement of the most severe kind, and it is done under government sponsorship. Such a drama series, which doesn’t even have the slightest link to reality and which presents Israeli soldiers as murderers of innocent children, isn’t worthy of being broadcast even by enemy states and certainly not in a (Muslim) state which has full diplomatic relations with Israel.”

    Israeli propaganda against its former closest Muslim ally is in full gear as result of Turkey’s booming economy, and country being accepted as ‘one of them’ by the Muslim world under Erdogan’s six-year governance. As expected, the Zionists have stoop to their usual game of ‘anti-Semitism’. Though recognizing that Erdogan himself is not an anti-Semite (he is reciepant of ADL’s highest award as ‘friend of Jews’) – the leader of Turkey’s 27,000-strong Jewish community, Sylvio Ovadya, recently asked Turkish president Abdullah Gul to make anti-Semitism a crime (sort of the Hate Law in the US and EU countries to protect Israeli interests).

    Joshua W. Walker, a Fellow at the powerful Zionist think tank, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), writing for the Foreign Policy magazine under the heading “What’s the matter with Turkey?”, played the usual ‘Islamophobe card”:

    “The consolidation of AKP’s political power has eliminated many of the traditional fault-lines in Turkey’s perennial Kulturkampf. Few Turkey watchers would have ever believed that the military establishment and an Islamist-rooted political party could make common cause. Yet, the AKP is now riding a wave of popular sentiment that accommodates a previously irreconcilable mix of religious and secular nationalism. Oddly, Turkey has become more European, more democratic, more Islamic, and increasingly more nationalist simultaneously. In this complex political environment, the AKP has resorted to the lowest common denominators of economic and political populism to ensure its appeal among a large swath of the Turkish electorate that is angry at the EU, the United States, and Israel.”

    Many Turk-watchers believe that since the signing of Turkey-Armeniean protocol – Turkey doesn’t need American Jewish Lobby’s support to shield it in the Congress from the alleged Armenian Genocide - carried out by the Crypto and Zionist Jews.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  18. #58
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Bibi: Israel is “a Jewish and civilized state”

    Adressing the world and the Palestinians from Zionist Knesset, on October 12, 2009 – Benjamin Netanyahu parroted the usual Zionist lies to fool the world at large. While he demanded that Palestinian must recognize the Zionist occupation as a “Jewish State” – he blasted the report prepared by a UN team headed by a fellow Jew, the South African Judge, Goldstone, calling it: “The distorted report, written by this distorted committee undermines Israel’s right to defend itself. The report encourages terrorism and threatens peace. Israel will not take risks for peace if it cannot defend itself.”

    Then the cunning Zionist added: “For 62 years, the Palestinians have been saying ‘No’ to the Jewish state. I am once again calling upon our Palestinian neighbors; say ‘Yes’ to the the Jewish state. Without recognition of Israel as the state of the Jews we shall not be able to attain peace.”

    Now, is there a way to tell this Zionazi PM that before demanding that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a “Jewish state” – the idiot should asking the world body (UN) and Tel Aviv’s puppet ZOGs to accept his lie. They all address the UNcountry as the “State of Israel”. With the exception of Israel’s ministry of religious affairs – nothing can be found “Jewish” in Israel. The great majority of Zionist leaders are and were atheist (the only ‘Jewishness’ they have wass that they were given birth by Jewish women) and very anti-Semite in their writings and actions. The UNcountry tops the list of eveything which is regarded “unkosher” in Torah – from pornography to prostitution; from drugs to sex-slavery; from war to legal land robbery; from gayism to human organ trafficking, and using a foreign country (US) to wage wars against the Muslim world.

    Former BBC and ITN specialist on Middle East, Alan Hart, recently posted an article on his blog, titled, Israel\’s right or not to exist – The facts and truth - saying:

    According to history as written by the winner, Zionism, Israel was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the UN Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. This is propaganda nonsense.

    1. In the first place the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestine did not have the right to decide to partition Palestine or assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.

    2. Despite that, by the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly did pass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal – meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.

    3. The truth is that the General Assembly’s partition proposal never went to the Security Council for consideration. Why not? Because the U.S. knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force given the extent of Arab and other Muslim opposition to it; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.

    4. So the partition plan was vitiated (became invalid) and the question of what the hell to do about Palestine – after Britain had made a mess of it and walked away, effectively surrendering to Zionist terrorism – was taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the U.S. was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence – actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.

    The truth of the time was that the Zionist state, which came into being mainly as a consequence of pre-planned ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist UNLESS … Unless it was recognised and legitimized by those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state. In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved.

    And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not and cannot take from the Palestinians by force.

    No wonder Prime Minister Netanyahu is more than a little concerned on this account.

    Israel’s leaders have always known the truth summarised above. It’s time for the rest of the world to know it.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  19. #59
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Sudan: New Zionist Strategy

    American mass-media has reported that Hilary Clinton is expected to announce Obama administration’s new strategy on Sudan on Monday – from bullying to dialogues with the Islamist government in Khartoum. It’s another turn-around from the man who during his election campaign promised “tough” actions against Islamic regimes in Tehran and Khartoum to the applause of the Jewish Lobby, which played the role of the midwife for the ‘Save Darfur’ movement.

    Responding to the news, Sudanese government spokesperson, Dr. Kamal Obeid said that any action or relation that comes in favour of the Sudanese people’s will be dealt with accordingly. Observers see that the American new policy might be balanced toward Sudan.

    In an article, titled Israeli Role in the Darfur Incidents published in Sudan Vision Daily on September 22, said: “African continent was considered by Theodor Hertzel as a geographic and geo-strategic extension for Israel. He was hoping that the eastern part of this black continent would be the target for a second wave of Jewish colonist settlement. On the other hand, Ben Gurion used to consider it a corner stone in Israel plans at encircling the hostile Arab region by a wide zone of friendship and alliance relations that connect Israel with some of the countries bordering the Arab neighbors of Israel. This geo-strategy becomes more significant in being one of the sides of the alliance triangle that include Israel and Ethiopia to form a front that is parallel to the northern front formed by Israel and each of the secular Turkey and the “Shahenshahi” Iran (pre-1979)……. The establishment of Islamic government in Khartuom disturbed those responsible in Tel Aviv and they suffered the nightmare of a Sudanese Iranian Alliance under two Islamic regimes. This was quite a threat against all Israeli plans and arrangements aiming at safeguarding the “Hebrew State” regional security northwards as well as southwards. It also threatened to abort all attempts and projects aiming at enhancing Israeli presence in the Nile Basin and Black Africa in general…..”

    Sudanese President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir, who is sought by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for the Israeli trumped-up so-called “war crimes in Darfur” – is due to visit Uganda next week on invitation from Ugadan Presiden Yoweri Musievini to attend a special African Union (AU) meeting on refugees. Zionist lobby groups at ICC and Amnesty International have asked Kampala (a signatory to ICC’s Rome Statute) to arrest Al-Bashir if he land on Ugandan soil. Musievini have laughed at this stupid Zionists’ suggestion. I wonder how many of these Islamophobes would have the courage to admit that Darfur SLM maintains an office in Israel since early 2008 (reported by pro-Israel Sudan Tribune on March 7, 2008).

    American author, Mahmood Mamdani in his research book Saviors and Survivors, documents the history of the tribal conflicts in Africa’s largest country (Muslims 70%, Christians 5%, and 25% indigenous beliefs). The author explains the British colonial rulers’ division of Darfur on tribal basis as the root cause of the current problem – which later gave rise to the civil war (1987-89) between nomadic tribes over fertile land in the south; foreign countries (Russia, the US, France, and Israel) meddling in the region and Israel’s fear of the emergence of a pro-Palestinian Islamic state in Africa, which it consider its playground for controlling Islamic resistance in several Muslim-majority African countries, such as Somalia.

    In 2007 Bruce Dixon wrote that all the genocide hype against Khartuom regime is for the oil and Israel (just like invasion of Iraq and now propaganda war against Tehran). The ‘Save Darfur’ was created in 2005 by two Jewish organizations – the American Jewish World Service and the US Holocaust Memorial. The ‘Save Darfur’ is infested with Zionist Jew and Christian individuals and groups, who using the organization as PR front for propagating Israeli interests in the US and Africa.
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  20. #60
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default NIE is not a ‘Holy Cow’

    Siobhan Gorman and Jay Solomon reporting for The Wall Street Journal(October 16, 2009) told us that fact. I bet they would say the same thing about Zionists’ narrative of the Holocaust. According to their story, the US intelligence agencies are rethinking of rewriting their 2007 version of National Intelligence Eastimat (NIE) in order to look it like the earlier intelligence reports on Iraq’s Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD). And why they want to change their own findings that Iran stopped its nuclear weapon program in 2003? Well, the writers spill the beans: “The 2007 report created a political headache for the Bush administration (which is replace with a more pro-Israel Obama administration) when Republicans and some allied government such as criticized the broad public conclusion that Iran was backing off its nuclear ambitions.”

    Interestingly, NIE’s new version submitted to Barack Obama in 2009 – reasserted the 2007 conclusion – that there was no convincing evidence to prove that Iran’s nuclear work was in any way military. The Wall Street Journal article blamed French, German, and British intelligence agencies for not accepting the NIE or IAEA findings on Iranian nuclear activities. If I remember correctly, some French intelligence sources did point their fingers toward Mossad being behind the 9/11 tragedy.

    In June 2009 – Gen. Meir Dagan, director of Israeli Mossad told Knesset that Iran could have a bomb no sooner than 2014.

    Pauk Craig Roberts writing in the The Canadian Charger said:

    “Iran is developing nuclear energy which is its right as a signatory to the NPT. Iran’s nuclear program is subject to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which consistently reports that its inspections find no diversion of enriched uranium to a weapon program.

    The position taken by Israel and its puppet in Washington, is that Iran must not be allowed to have the right as signatory of NPT that every other signatory has, because Iran might divert enriched uranium to a weapon program.

    In other words, Israel and the US claim the right to abrogate Iran’s right to develop nuclear energy. The Israel/US position has no basis in the international law or anything other than the arrogance of Israel and the United States.

    The hypocrisy is extreme.

    Israel is not a signatory to the NPT and developed its nuclear weapons illegally on the sly, with, as far as we know, US help.

    As Israel is an illegal possessor of nuclear weapons and has a fanatical government that is capable of using them, crippling sanctions should be applied to force it to disarm. Israel qualifies for crippling sanctions for anothr reason. It’s an aparteid state, as former US president Jimmy Carter demonstrated in his book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid …..

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •