Welcome to the Net Muslims Forums.
Page 1 of 17 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 328

Thread: Rehmet's Blog

  1. #1
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Rehmet's Blog

    According to Israeli military sources – one in eight Israelis is now in Hamas rocket range. The Zionis entity is afraid that 800,000 of its Jewish citizens face threat, most without any kind of protection from the growing arsenal that the Islamic resistance is being allowed to accomulate (maybe, it’s a signal for Obama to pump tens of billions of dollars of US taxpayers’ money into IOF killing machine). And we all know the rules of the game – Don’t talk about the two million Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank – and the entire Lebanese nation being within Israel’s F16s range.

    So question is why Hamas or other Palestinian resistance groups in Gaza are throwing ‘deadly’ rockets on those peaceful Jewish settlers who were never accepted in their ancestral European countries? Well – the rocket attacks are in response to the Nazi-style blockade of a 1.5 million Native Muslim and Christian inhabitants of the tiny city of Gaza – by the Zionist entity, the US, EU and Egypt. a total blockade of a sovereign country or a city is an act of war under international law and thus must be resisted by all available means. A similar blockade of Japan by ZOG Washington resulted in Pearl Harbor. As a typical racist entity, it did not put blockade of other two so-called “hostile” countries – Germany and Italy.

    Personally, I don’t think Zionist thugs need not to worry about Hamas rockets, but the ’human rockets’ within Israeli society, who are loosing hope for the safe future of their next generations under Zionist rule. Neve Gordon, an Israeli Jewish citizen is one of the growing number of Israeli Jews, who have come to the conclusion that the only way to save future generations from being in state of fear forever – is to dismantle the state of Israel and live under one Palestinian state for Jews, Muslims and Christians. Writing for the LA Time under the title Boycott Israel - Neve Gordon said:

    “The most accurate way to describe Israel today is an appartheid state. For more than 42 years, Israel has controlled the land between the Jordan Valley and Mediterranean Sea. Within this region about six million Jews and close to five million Palestinian reside. Out of this population 3.5 million Palestinian and almost half a million Jews live in the areas Israel occupied in 1967, and yet while these two groups live in the same area, they are subjected to totally different legal systems. The Palestinians are stateless and lack most of the basic human rights. By sharp contrast, all Jews – whether they live in the occupied territories or in Israel – are citizens of state of Israel.

    Geographically, the one-state solution appears much more feasible because Jews and Palestinians are already totally enmeshed; indeed, “on the ground,” the one-state solution (in an apartheid manifestation) is a reality….”

    Frankly, I was least surprised to read about how US president Obama, has fell on his Christian knees in front of the demands of anti-Christs in Tel Aviv. It’s reported that Obama has promised to shut his mouth on the issue of new Jewish settlement in Arab East Jerusalen and push for more severe international sanctions against Islamic Iran – in bargain for Bibi’s promise to sit down with Fatah (not Palestinian elected government of Hamas) leaders for a new charade (aka peace negotiations)!

    Following are two videos showing that most of the so-called “Hamas rocket attacks” are Israeli False Flag operations to project Hamas as “world’s No.1 strongest military force”!!

    Video
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  2. #2
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Zionists’ academic terrorism

    “Why discredit, defame and silence those with opposing viewpoints? I believe it is because the Zionist Lobby knows it cannot win based on facts,” – Dr. Joel Beinin (Jewish professor at Stanford University in his article “Silencing critics not way to Middle East peace”, San Francisco Chronicle, February 4, 2007).

    “I grew up as a White girl in the Jim Crow South and I have spent my adult life in the study of racism, what I see when I go to Palestine is Jim Crow on steroids,” – Tema Okun, a Jewish academic in ‘A Jewish state – or Jewish values?’, Mondoweiss, July 12, 2009).

    “How tragic that in our own time the very state established by the Jews in the aftermath of this evil has become a place where racialism, religious discrimination, militarism, and injustic prevail; and that Israel itself has become a pariah state whin the world community. Events taking place today are all too reminiscent of the pogroms from which our own forefathers fled two and three generations ago – but this time those in authority are Jews and the victims are Muslim and Christian Palestinians,” – statement from 18 prominent American Jews, The Nation, February 3, 1988.

    Many Universities in the US have a long history of sanctioning academic, students, and holding debates – critical to the Zionist entity, Zionism or even Zionist Jews – from professor Norman Finkelstein to professor William I. Robinson (University of California – ADL charging his e-mail criticizing Israeli attacks on Gaza, Dec-Jan 2009 – as ‘anti-Semitism’) to professor Joel Kovel being fired from Bard College (for authoring the book ‘Overcoming Zionism’) to professor Tariq Ramadan (banned from joining Notre Dame University in 2004 and now fired by Dutch University for hosting a religious show at Iranian TV).

    Since September 11, 2001 – this Zionazi censorship of ‘freedom of speech’ has beening creeping into neighboring Canada too. The pro-Israeli Jewish groups like Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC), Canada Israel Committee, Jewish Defence League, B’nai Brith, etc. has been going crazy to get Ottawa ban anti-Zionist academics, politician, books and even words (calling Israel an Apartheid state) from telling the truth about Zionist imperialism in the Middle East and their Nazi-style treatment of the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians. Be it professor Norman Finkelstein (a Jew) or David Olesker (a British-born Israeli Jew) or George Galloway (former Mayor of London and a Christian British MP) or Dr. David F. Nobel (a Jew professor at York University, who filed a ‘character assassination’ law suit against Canadian Jewish lobby groups for US$25 million in 2006) or the Jewish professor Michael Neumann (Peterbrough’s Trent University for his “anti-Israel” essays) or professor Yakov M. Rabkin (University of Montreal, who was called ‘a self-hating Jew’ for authoring the book ‘A Threat from Within: A Century of Jewish Opposition to Zionism’). But in contrast to that anti-Muslim racist Jews like Daniel Pipes, Israeli prime minister Bibi, and dozens of Israeli academics have been welcomed at Toronto’s York University, Concordia University, and other Universities across Canada.

    Canadian lawyer and writer, Edward C. Corrigan, in his latest article titled Is it anti-Semitic to defend Palestinian human rights?, published in The Canadian Charger (August 26, 2009), wrote:

    “All across Canada and in the United States, there is an organized campaign to suppress criticism of Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. The campaign is especially strong on university campuses where many voices have been raised in support of human rights for the Palestinians. One such example is the attempt to suppress the Public Interest Research Group, founded by Ralph Nader, at the University of Ottawa for their support for Palestinian human rights.

    Similar anti-Palestinian campaigns have occurred at many universities in Canada including the University of Toronto, the University of Western Ontario and York University.

    An attack against a student group that was sympathetic to the Palestinians occurred at the University of Western Ontario in 1982. The student group was refused official recognition because of its support for the Palestinians and for sponsoring Palestinian and Arab speakers. After this refusal a complaint was made to the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

    After a long battle, and with the support of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and its General Counsel Alan Borovoy, and a supportive editorial in The Globe & Mail, the Ontario Human Rights Commission compelled the University Students Council at the University of Western Ontario to issue a statement of regret and to ratify the student group. The refusal was deemed discriminatory against Palestinians and persons associated with Palestinians.

    Another tactic is to smear such individuals who have supported the Palestinians with allegations of anti-Semitism. One such individual was Arch Bishop Desmond Tutu. A few complaints from the Jewish community led to the Noble Prize winner being banned from speaking on campus by the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota. Tutu was attacked because of statements he made criticizing Israeli policy toward the Palestinians that some Jewish individuals said were “anti Semitic.”

    This campaign is also an attack on the numerous dissenting Jews who support human rights for the Palestinians. Canadian Jewish groups like Not in Our Name (NION) and Jewish Independent Voices (Canada) and their support for the Palestinians and their criticism of the “Jewish State,” are simply ignored. For political purposes they simply do not exist.

    The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, as well as the massacres, rapes and illegal confiscation of Palestinian property, is well documented by Israeli historians.

    The view that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel, or its actions, is pure and simple racism against Palestinians. The Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims have many legitimate reasons to criticize the policies and actions of “the Jewish State.” A state that aggressively, and repeatedly, attacks its neighbours and is slowly but systematically ethnically cleansing its non-Jewish population is not above criticism.

    Many Jews are anti-Zionist and opposed the settlement of Jews in Palestine….”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  3. #3
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Iranian journey: From an ally to Israel’s Enemy No.1

    “We have no connection with the Arabs. Our regime, our culture, our relations, is not the fruit of this region. There is no political affinity between us, or international solidarity,” – David Ben Gurion quoted by Avi Shlaim in ‘Israel, the Great Powers and the Middle East crisis of 1958′. In other words, Ben Gurion was admitting in 1952 that western Jews don’t belong to Palestine.

    “US has become the power to spell the death knell for the Iranian Revolution. The defeat of Iran has become the mean to deliver a double blow to the Arabs and Muslim psyche as well as to Islamist resistance (Hizb’Allah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc.). The Arabs would become docile, and the Middle East would sccumb like so many dominoes,” – William Kristol, a Jewish Lobby mouthpiece wrote in 2003.

    The leaders of the World Zionist Congress (founded at Basle, 1897) knew that Arab Muslim world would never accept a European Jewish homeland in the Middle East. Therefore, they cultivated close relations with the non-Arab Muslim world, especially those Muslim nation-states under the British, French or Russian colonization or dominated by the US. As a result, Iran under Shah and Turkey under Kemalist military rule, became the first Muslim nation-states to recognize the Zionist entity.

    The Iran-Israel relations were so close under the Shah’s regime that King’s bodyguards, Iranian Army and country’s security services ( Sawak) – which killed thousands of Iranian civilians and anti-Shah political activist – were entirely trained by Israeli Mossad, Shin Bet and Israeli Army. Many of Sawak’s top offials were either Iranian Jews or Israeli officials. Even the organization’s head at the time of Islamic Revolution (1979) was an Israeli military officer who escaped to Israel. Iran also helped Iraqi Jews (130,000) to migrate to the Zionist entity. Mossad used Sawak agents to incite Kurdish revolt against Baghdad. There were great monetary benefits for the Zionists in Iran-Israel friendship. Iran supplied 80% of Israel’s oil needs at lower price than the market price. Iran also invested US$1.2 billion in Israeli arms industry (code name ‘Tzur’) in 1975. After 1967 war, Zionist prime minister, Levi Eshkol, and Reza Shah Pahlavi agreed to set-up a joint oil venture, known as Trans-Asiatic Oil. In its heyday, Trans-Asiatic was an economic empire with a turn-over of billions of dollars. After 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iranian National Oil Company stopped selling oil to Trans-Asiatic, killing the Zionist hen which laid golden eggs. Zionist regime still refuses to pay Iranian share of the hundreds of millions of dollars (based on 1979 value) stolen from the joint account. Similarly, the US has stolen more than US$28 billion from Iranian banking assests.

    Immediately after the 1979 Islamic Revolution’s success, Imam Khomeini, ordered the termination of all relations with the Zionist entity – and Israeli Embassy building in Tehran be given to PLO to open its first foreign embassy there. However, Yassar Arafat, being a secularist Arab nationalist – refused to accept Iran’s generous offer. Later, Imam Khomeini, declared that the last Friday of the month of Ramadan each year as ‘Al-Quds Day’ to show Iran’s support for the liberation of Palestine from Zionist occupation. Today, Islamic Iran is the only Muslim nation-state which openly support the duely elected government of Hamas.

    Washington convinced Reza Shah to join the so-called ‘Atom for Peace Program’ in the 1950s. Later the US sold a 5 mW nuclear research reactor to Iran and both the US, Israel and some European countries provided the technical support to setup several research centers in Iran. However, after the Islamic Revolution – Imam Khomeini ordered the closure of all the nuclear research work – calling it a ‘Devil’s work’ and being against Islamic teachings. The current spiritual leader, Ayatullah Khameini, carries a similar opinion. Personally, I think Islamic Iran must have a nuclear arsenal as a ‘deterrant’.

    Since the day Tehran cancelled its diplomatic relations with the Zionist entity – Jewish media has declared a war against the Islamic regime in Tehran. For the last 30 years it has not stopped its propaganda lies about Islamic rgime and the Muslims at large – in order to prepare the westren world for the future war with Islamic Iran. Zionists’ propaganda war strategy has brought fruits through the Zionist-controlled mainstream media and the help it receives from ZOGs in the West.

    The Iranian nuke hoax in not a recent Hasbara lie. In fact it was Israel’s current president, Shimon Peres, who fabricated this hoax in his interview 1993 : “Iran would be armed with nuclear bomb in 1999″. Former Mossad official, Yossi Alpher, an adviser to Israeli prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, told the New York Time four days after Bill Clinton was elected US President: :”Iran has to be identified as Enemy No.1″. Professor Israel Shahak in his book Open Secrets wrote that right after the Buenos Aires terrorist attack (a Mossad false-flag operation) – “Israel instantly perceived this assault as a convenient opportunity to form an anti-Iranian coalition….. But one may ask a deeper question here: why do terrorist assaults have a tendency to occur exactly when their occurence is for Israel a ‘convenient opportunity’.

    Alastair Crooke, wrote for the Le Monde diplomatique under the heading The strange tale of Iran and Israel: “Begin’s (a wanted terrorist by the British mandate authority in Palestine) electoral victory in 1977 entrenched a more radical vision than that of the Labour Party, that of the revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabontinsky. The later had argued in his seminal “Iron Wall” article in 1923 that there could never be agreement with the Arabs….”

    “In 1982, Ariel Sharon invaded Lebanon with the aim of ousting the PLO and establishing a friendly Christian Maronite hegemony in Beirut – so inflicting a devastating defeat on Syria, a major pillar of Arabism. It proved a miscalculation, for it precipitated the decline of Maronites and encourage Shia mobalization in the South and Bekaa Valley, from which a formidable a new enemy, Hezbullah, emerged.”

    “In fact it was the West’s materialist “modernity”, on which Israeli doctrine was justified, which repelled Iranian leaders the most. But though they were at odds with the US and Israel over their vision of society and their efforts to spread a culture of secular, materialist and free-market society across the region (which many Iranian saw in turn as archaic, and even colonialist) – they did not want to defeat Israel militarily. The Revolution was not conceived with an aggressive regional ambitions; it did not threaten Israel or the US in conventional military terms….”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  4. #4
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Anti-Semitism: Zionists’ tool to silence the critics

    “Every initiative against anti-Semitism is welcome. But if the declaration is general and doesn’t specifically relate to the article in Aftonbladet, it will not resolve anything, ” – Yigal Palmor, Israeli foreign ministry official’s warning to EU foreign ministers meeting to be held in Stockholm on September 4-5, 2009 under Swedish presidency.

    “In Europe, when someone criticizes Israeli policies, we bring in Holocaust – and when someone in this country (US) criticizes Israeli policizes, we bring in Anti-Semitism…..” – former Israeli minister Shulamit Aloni told Amy Goodman in her interview on ‘Democracy Now’.

    Most of the leaders of the World Zionist movement were not only atheists (coomunists, socialist, agnostics, Nazis, etc) but also Jew-haters in their writings. It was Theodor Herzl who wrote in his ‘Diaries’: “Anti-Semites will be our most dependable friends, the anti-Semite countries, our allies…” However, they cloaked themselves in Judaism to fool the world Jewry – which they failed until the WW II. It was the 1940s – when Zionist leaders decided to used their corrupted Scofield Bible, and took the absolute rights for the terms “anti-Semitism” and “Holocaust” – even though the Jews played far greater part in the genocides of Christians in Germany, USSR, Ukraine and most of the Eastern European countries.

    The latest victim of the ‘anti-Semitism’ is the Swedish journalist Donald Dostrom for his unforgiveable act of publishing the The Organ Theft Affair, which in fact this is not the first time he has pulled the skull-cap of Zionists’ heads. The book Inshallah: The conflict between Israel and Palestine, the book edited by Bostrom and published in 2001 – was an account of 19-year-old Palestinian, Bilal, who was shot by Zionazi thugs, his body abducted and returned after five days – with his body cut open from his abdoman up to his chin.

    Historically, the grear majority of present-day Jews are not even Semites (the descendants the original 12 Tribes of Israel). They’re the descendants of Khazarian Turks who converted to Judaism in the 9th-10th century CE. Contrary to that – some millions of Arabs Muslims and Christians can claim to be the true Semite people.

    Joharah Baker in her latest article titled Do not criticize Israel, you anti-Semite wrote:

    “Isn’t it about time people see though the smokescreen? The history of the Jews is full of misfortune and suffering. But so is the history of so many other peoples, including the Palestinians, who have been made to pay the ultimate price for the Jews’ persecution. Pulling out the anti-Semitism card whenever Israel is pushed into a corner, rather than examine its own lack of morality in dealing with the Palestinians, should be a losing strategy, simply because it is such a shaky argument. However, guilt-tripping the world into apologizing yet again to the Jews for the sins of the past has worked for Israel for many years, unlike other peoples whose injustices have gone unrecognized. It has been able to maintain a military occupation, build illegal settlements and subjugate an entire people all in the name of its own security and as a safeguard from further persecution.”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  5. #5
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default The “Crippling sanctions” against Iran

    “In Israel, a country stolen from the Palestinians, fanatics control the government. One of the fanatics is the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” – Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of US Treasury.

    “Zionism is best described as an abnormal nationalism. This singular fact has engendered a history of deepening conflicts between Israel-leading an alliance of Western states – and the Islamicate more generally…” – Professor M. Shahid Alam in ‘Zionism: An Abnormal Nationalism‘.

    Last week after his talks with German Zionist Chancellor Angela Markel – the fanatic prime minister of the Zionist entity, Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi) called for ”crippling sanctions” against Iran to halt the country’s nuclear program. The Jewish radical suggested that even if Russia and China prevent the UN Security Council from approving tougher sanctions against Tehran – a “coalition of the willing (the US, Germany, France, Britain, Australia, etc.)” could enact its own measures.

    Zionist think tanks lead by the Jewish-controlled Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) are already paving the ground for Washington to lead Bibi’s “coalition of willings” and send American soldiers to die for Israel – the only nuclear power in the region. On September 2, 2009 – its publication carried an interview, titled ‘No Sign of Iranian Flexibility’ with a Zionist “expert on nuclear policy”, George Parkovich, at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (quite an attractive name for a pro-Israel organization!!). The interview put the entire blame on Iranian door for not listening to the UN, IAEA, or the international community regarding its nuclear program without mentioning even once that Iran may need a nuclear detterant to ward-off the only nuclear colonial bully in the Middle East with the history of invading all of its neighboring countries. Commenting on Washington’s position on “tougher sanctions against Iran” by the end of September 2009 – the “expert” recommeded that it’s very important to get approval of these “tougher sanctions” from UNSC primarily for political reasons:

    “The nuclear issue in Iran is largely political. It has been made into an issue of nationalism. So if you have the Security Council, which represents the entire and especially Asian powers, says that Iran has gone too far and is out of line (for using its rights as a signatory of NPT and giving moral support to the oppressed native people in Palestine and Lebanon), that has a big impact on Iranian politics and on the Iranian psyche. If the entire world basically says that you’re beyond the pale, people will turn on the government and say, “How could you put us this far out of line?”. But it’s not the Security Council, and it’s just United States and some Western European countries, then the effect of that is much less. People will say it’s just a Zionist-American conspiracy (how true!!) and they never liked us anyway (Yep – Jonathan Pollard and hundreds of other Jews caught spying on US were all Iranians!).

    Micah Zenko, another CFR member in his article in LA Times, titled ‘Israel has Iran in its sight’ – tried to blackmail Obama by suggesting that he better come on board on Israeli plan to attack Iran – because even if Israel did attack Iran alone - the US will be sucked in the war on Israeli side – as “they never liked us anyway”. In order to make his point, he cited a few earlier Israeli military operations which it never bothered to consult the US before invading other countries.

    In October 1956, Israel, Britain and France launched an ill-fated assault against Egypt to seize control of the Suez Canal. The day before, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles grilled Abba Eban, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., about Israel’s military buildup on the border with Egypt, but Eban kept quiet about his country’s plans.

    In June 1967, Israel initiated the Six-Day War without notice to Washington, despite President Johnson’s insistence that Israel maintain the status quo and consult with the U.S. before taking action. Only days before the war began, Johnson notified Prime Minister Levi Eshkol in a personal message: “Israel just must not take preemptive military action and thereby make itself responsible for the initiation of hostilities.”

    On June 7, 1981, Israeli fighter-bombers destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak shortly before it was to be fueled to develop the capacity to make nuclear weapons-grade plutonium. Again, Washington was not informed in advance. President Reagan “condemned” the attack and “thought that there were other options that might have been considered.”

    On September 6, 2007, Israeli aircraft destroyed what was believed to be a North Korean-supplied plutonium reactor in Al Kibar, Syria. Four months earlier, Israeli intelligence officials had provided damning evidence to the Bush administration about the reactor, and the Pentagon drew up plans to attack it. Ironically, according to New York Times reporter David Sanger, President Bush ultimately decided the U.S. could not bomb another country for allegedly possessing weapons of mass destruction. An administration official noted that Israel’s attack went forward “without a green light from us. None was asked for, none was given.”

    By citing those earlier operations – Micah Zenko concluded that if Israel decides to attack Iran, it will be deaf to entreaties from Obama administration to refrain from using military force. “Soon after the operation, Washington will express concern to Tel Aviv publicly and privately – but the long-standing US-Israeli relationship will remain as strong as ever with continued close diplomatic, economic, intelligence and military cooperation”.

    Paul Craig Roberts in his article Why not crippling sanctions for Israel and the US? - says that it’s Israel and NOT Islamic Iran – which has evicted native people from their ancestral land and herding them into ghettoes – and it’s Israel which has attacked its neighboring countries, bombed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure. Iran as a signatory of NPT (Israel never signed NPT) has the right to develop nuclear power for peaceful use, like any other NPT signatory. However, both Israel and its puppet regime in Washington demand that Tehran must not be allowed to use its such international rights – because Iran might divert enriched uranium to produce a weapon program – which incidently, both Israel and the US have for decades.

    “Sadly the ironclad agreement between Israel and Washington to war against Muslim people is far stronger than the connection between American public and the government. In a dinner party last Thursday fot Israel’s militar attache’ in Washington, who is returning to Israel to become deputy chief of staff of Israeli military – Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff , declared that ‘the US will always stand with Israel’. No matter how many war crimes Israel commits. No matter how many women and children Israel murders. No matter how many Palestinians Israel drives from their homes, villages, and lands. If truth could be told, the true axis-of-evil is the United States and Israel.”

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  6. #6
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Nigeria: Robin Hood and Mossad

    Last month the Nigerian resistance umbrella group, the Movement of the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), agreed to observe a 60 day cease-fire after one of its top leader, Okah, was released on the orders of Nigerian president Umaru Yar’Adua. MEND is projected as country’s Robin Hood by some Nigerian bloggers for standing up for the rights of the poor-majority living within an oil-rich region – whose natural resources have been plundered by the western multi-national oil companies and the destruction of environment which has affected tens of millions of the native people.

    During their colonial period of almost three centuries – England, France, Belgium, Spain, Potugal, Germany and Italy – went on a looting spree of African continent’s natural and human resources. Not only the robbed the natives – they took tens of millions of them as slaves – whose descendants served their colonial masters in the US till 1960s. How far western plunder went? It can be judged from US president Franklin Roosevelt’s statement after his visit to Gambia on January 13, 1943: “It’s most horrible thing I have ever seen in my life. The natives are five thousand years back of us. The British have been there for two hundred tears – for every dollar that the British have put into Gambia, they have taken out ten. It’s just plain exploitation of those people.” President Roosevelt was talking about the same Africal people who established several great civilizations and empires between late 7th century to the late 15th century – when most part of the known West was still going through its Dark Age.

    While the European looters became rich – the great majority of African natives became poorer. For example the city of Brussels, the capital of Belgium and HQ of the EU – was built on lootings of Congo’s resources, enslavement, and amputations of hands and 10 million death. And when the colonial masters left, the natives found out that their national vaults were empty.

    Since 2006 – China entrance to Nigerian oil sector has sent alarm bells to western multi-national oil cartels – as the case in Sudan. This has made both the US and Israel very soar losers. After loosing Iran as its major oil supplier in 1980 – Zionist entity turned to Nigeria which had been supplying 50% of its oil supplies till 1980s. Gordon Thomas in his book, Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of Mossad, has detailed the Israel-Nigerian close co-operation in trade, arms and military training. The 1984 military coup lead by Major General Muhammadu Buhari worried Israel that the new Muslim leader might stop the oil supplies to show his support for the Palestinian cause. Mossad’s director Nahum Admoni traveled to Nigeria on a Canadian passport to meet Buhari. This month – several members of Nigerian parliament protested against government’s secret deal with Israel to help its security service personnel trained by Mossad.

    When an Israeli businessman working with Gilmore Engineering Nigeria Ltd. , Ehud Avni, was abducted by the Niger Delta militants – the Israeli ambassador, Moshe Ram, painted the situation in Niger Delta as ‘victim’ of propaganda hype similar to Israel and ‘guessed’ that the kidnapping of Ehud Avni may the work of Lebanese Hizbullah - based on the assumption that since a great majority of Nigerian Muslim population don’t like iNigerian government’s close relations with the Zionist entity which kills the Palestinian population on daily basis. Interestingly, due to kidnapping and violence, one would expect that Israeli embassy would advise Israeli citizens to avoid visiting Niger Delta – instead the Israeli government cautioned Jewish visitors against dealing with Muslims only!

    Nigeria is the most populous country (152 million) in Africa. Muslims make the majority religious group (48%) followed by Christians (34%) and Native religions (18%). Nigeria has a bitter history of Muslim-Christian communal violence. However, people like Imam Muhammad Ashafa and Pastor James Wuye, who fought on opposite sides till 1990s – who have put their energies together to teach tolerance among Muslims and Christians (watch the video below).

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  7. #7
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Virgin Mary painting irks Zionists

    Last week the National Federation of Israeli Journalist Union took down a series of paintings (like the one on the left) of Madonna-and-Child from its headquarters in Tel Aviv – because it reminded the Zionazi visitors of the face of a Palestinian female martyr (the suicide bomber). One of the artists, Galina Bleikh, said that she superimposed the faces of Palestinian female suicide bombers to raise the question: “How can a woman who comes to the world with the role of loving and giving life become a source of hatred and mudered?” Now, it’s useless the remind the self-denial idiot that millions of Israeli Jewish women are living inside houses built on the demolished homes of non-Jewish Palestinian Natives – or that Talmud and Jewish societies have been the most cruel toward its female population. Even the Jew males are required to say in daily prayers: “Thanks G-d for not making me a Gentile, a WOMAN or a Slave”.

    The Zionist hordes always have suffered from guilty conscience. They’re vey allergic to being reminded of their sorded history of Nazi collaboration or stabbing the US behind its back – the same power which have been feeding the parasite state since the 1950s. Zionists are aware of the fact that their entire ideology is based on myths, lies, and racism. That’s why they have created laws and organizations to make sure that people don’t talk about their criminal history.

    The Zionists are always in the front line to protect the ‘freedom of speech’ as long as it doesn’t criticize Jews, Zionism or Israel. Be it anti-Christian movie (Da Vinci Code, The Ten, etc.) or the Cartoons mocking Christians or the Danish Cartoons insulting the Prophet of Islam (pbuh), anti-Islam movie Fitna or anti-Islam DVD Obsession. However, when it comes to criticism of Zionist entity, Zionism or Judaism – the same champions of ‘freedom of speech’ have the habit of kicking their bottoms and crying on top of their voives: “Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitis!!” The world saw it after French scholar, Roger Garaudy published his book The Founding Myths of Israel; release of Mel Gibson’s movie The Passion of Christ; publication of Dr. Norman Finkelstein’s book ‘The Holocaust Industry’; publication of Mearsheimer and Walt (both Jewish writers) book ‘The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy’; publication of Jimmy Carter’s book Peace not Apartheid and the recent revelations of Israelis and Jews involved in human organ trafficking – are a few examples of how the Zionist creeps become paranoid when they face the truth.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  8. #8
    Administrator Array
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    21° 30' N, 39° 10' E
    Posts
    4,551

    Default

    Masha Allah, you have an impressive blog. Thanks for sharing.

  9. #9
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Was Michael Jackson an “anti-Semite”

    “There was a great beauty and gentility in Michael’s soul. I pray that Michael’s death will not be in vain, and that we see a return, even among Hollywood celeberities to the spiritual and family values that are life sustaining,” – Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

    On September 3, world’s greatest Pop singer, Michael Jackson 50 was finally laid to rest at Forest Hill Cemetery after more than two months his death. Michael died on died on June 25, 2009. Michael Jackson lived a very controversial life. To the tens of millions of his fans – he was ‘King of Pop’ – but to Israeli Zionazis, he was another among their mile-long list of anti-Semites. Well, if he indeed was an ‘anti-Semite’ as Israeli newspaper ‘Arutz Sheva’ honored him by the title on June 26, 2009 – advising the Jews “to consider saving those tears for someone more desrving” – Michael was surrounded by the Jews in private life and business for greater part of his career.

    Looking at Zionazis’ history of beating their critics by the ‘anti-Semite stick’ so freely – I wouldn’t give a hoot what they think of Michael Jackson – especially, when his ex-wife Debbie Rowe is Jewish and his other partner, Nona Paris Lola Ankhesnamun Jackson, who claims that not only the mother of Michael’s third son, Prince Michael II, but has Jewish roots too!! This shows Michael’s sort of close history of Adolf Hitler’s ‘anti-Semitism’ – for having two Jewish girlfriends and some German Jews holding top positions in Nazi administration and military.

    So why Zionazis think Michael Jackson was ‘anti-Semite’? Well, they do have some valid reasons, if one ignore their history of producing fake tapes, corrupt translations and character assasination tactics. According to Israeli propaganda sources – For example, Michael in his 1995 album, HIStory, had a song entitled “They don’t care about us” which had the following lyrics: “Jew me, sue me…kick me kike me”. Abe Foxman, the national director of Anti-Defamation League (an Israeli lobby group) demanded that the singer delete those lyrics and apologize to the Jewish community (Michael did apologize but could no help deleting them from millions of album copies aready sold). This is the same dude who a few years ago demanded that all references to Jews being evil people be deleted from the Christian Bible (NT). In November 2005, it was claimed that Michael in one of his voicemail tape to one of his former business managers, called Jews: “They suck….they’re leeches. It’s conspiracy. They do it on purpose”. As a human, being screwed up by many of his Jewish managers and associates in the music industry – Michael has reasons to be bitter about the Jews.

    According to JTA (June 30, 2009) – Michael Jackson, a Jehovah Witnessee by birth, visited LA Museum of Tolerance and Holocaust in 1993 – and was seen crying when he left the exhibit. In 1999, Michael developed a warm relationship with Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. In 2005, when he called his two former Jewish business associates “leeches” for looting him of millions of dollar – he was also seen wearing a red string on his wrist (worn by Kabbalah adherents). Michael met Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon at Rabbi Boteach’s home. Rabbi Marvin Heir, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Museum – gave Michael a private tour of the museum. Jackson’s two older sons, Prince Michael I and Paris Michael Katherine were born to Michael’s Jewish nurse, Debbie Rowe, and under Jewish law – are Jewish.

    Michael Jackson became a Muslim last December. The Zionist-controlled mainstream media deliberately suppressed this news for obvious reasons. Islam and Muslims are projected by this media as enemies of the West, therefore, any mention of Michael’s conversion to Islam would have undermined this ‘Islamophobe’ campaign.

    I bet Debbie and her Wall Street lawyers would be conspiring right now how to dip their dirty hand into Jackson’s US$1 billion state – though to some reports, Michael was to pay US$500 million to various vultures who managed to win cases against him on trump-up evidence.

    Some tribute to Michael Jackson can be read here.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  10. #10
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Canadian “vassals of Israel”

    “To fight anti-Semitism, it’s crucial to dissociate Jews and Judaism from the state of Israel and its behaviour. Our parliamentarians should affirm the right of all Canadians to criticize Israel like any other country in the world without the fear of being labelled ‘anti-Semitic’. This would be a sure way to rid Canada of the scourge of anti-Semitism, new and old,” – Professor Yakov M. Rabkinis (University of Montreal)

    “Islamophobia finds expression in Canada not just in public sneers and acts of racially-motivated violence – but also, more substantively in acts of state – the corruption or defiance of the law on the part of CSIS, the RCMP and our federal government,” – Dr. Michael Keefer.

    The term “Vassals of Israel” was coined by the former Israeli ambassador to France, Elie Barnavi, for individuals often mistaken for Jewish leaders. Basically, these ‘leaders’ give priority to the interests of a foreign country (Israel) over the interests of the countries they themselves live in.

    Recently, to the great joy of Israel Lobby - Two Canadian MPs, Scott Reid and Mario Silva gave birth to the so-called Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA) in June 2009. The group has 21 members from Canada’s House of Common. No such coalition to fight Islam-Muslim bashing in Canada exists – though Muslims form the largest religious minority (over 800,000) in Canada.

    The Independent Jewish Voices (Canada), which believes that criticism of the Zionist entity’s actions don’t amount to ‘anti-Semitism’ – had this to say in its submission to the coalition: “As Jews, we take true anti-Semitism – that is, discrimination and attacks on Jews and Judaism – very seriously. However, we reject the false assumptions on which the CPCCA and its efforts are based. While it claims that its purposes is ‘not really about limiting legitimate criticism of state of Israel’. However, its website says that “call for the destruction of state of Israel are inherently anti-Semitism”. IJV believes that this statement is part of organized attempt on the part of partisans of Israel to conflate the call for the dismantling of repressive Israeli institutions and ending repressive Israeli practices regarding Palestinians with the physical destruction of the Jewish population of Israel…. There is no evidence of significant rise of anti-Semitism in Canada or elsewhere….”

    In 2004 – a survey carried out by Canada’s pro-Israeli Jewish organizations (Canadian Jewish Council, Canadian Council for Israel, Jewish Advocacy, B’nai Brith, etc.) found very low levels of anti-Semitism in Canada.

    Bruce Katz, in his open letter to CPCCA wrote: “The list (members) includes a good number of people who are associated with the pro-Israel Lobby and who have issued statements in the past which might lead one to believe that they harbour anti-Arab and anti-Muslim sentiments. One of the honourable member sitting on your commission went so far as to suggest that food be cut-off to the already beleaguered population of Gaza, this during the last federal election period. Are there any parliamentarians of Arab descent or of Muslim faith sitting on your commission and if not, why not? When one add these facts to already established tone of the commission’s proposed discussion. You mention in your FAQ section that “while accusation of Blood Libel (professor Ariel Toaff in his book ‘Blood Passover’ has admitted the truth behind the libel) are still being made against the Jewish people, instead they are being directed against the State of Israel, such that anti-Zionism is being used as a cover for anti-Semitism….” It’s apparent that the scope of your commission is not to look at the nature of anti-Semitism as such, but attempt to manipulate the definition of anti-Semitism so as to make it synonymous with criticism of Israeli policy…..”

    Canada’s Zionist groups has quite a history of crying “wolf” when it comes to some criticism of Israel or Jews. For example – In 1996 and 1997, British Columbia HRC took weekly ‘North Shore News’ for publishing an anti-Jew column. Then in 2002, Canada’s Federal HRC demanded that Ernst Zundel remove his Holocaust revisionist article from his website. Also in 2002, Alberta HRC took ‘Alberta Report’ magazine to task for spreading hatred against Jews. However, when Canada’s leading magazine MaCleans’ published a very disgusting lie about Muslim and Islam – written by an ex-Jew Islamophobe – The Jewish Lobby supported the magazine for using its right of ‘freedom of speech’.

    Historically, the term ‘anti-Semitism’ was coined in Europe during its Dark Age and it was based on the Christian perception of their fellow Jew citizen in Spain and Portugal, who sought Muslim patronage during Muslim rules in those countries and were preferred by Moorish kings over their Christian subjects.
    Interestingly ‘anti-Semitism’ has nothing to do with Israelite tribes (descendents of 12 sons of prophet Jacob aka Israel) as the most followers of Judaism during Roman occupied Palestine – the Sephardic Jews – were not from Israelite tribes but North African Berber tribes, who converted to Judaism during third century after Christ. The same goes for the larger ethnic Jewish group of European Jews – Ashkenazi are descendents of Turk tribes of Khazaria, who converted to Judaism during 10th century.

    The ethnic background of these two major ethnic groups of today’s 13.5 million world population shatter Zionist myth that Palestine was promised to the “Children of Israel”

    There is no use denying the fact that Jews living in Christian-dominated Europe were treated as a second-class citizen – not just for Catholics’ belief that it were Jews, who killed their Lord Christ – but also for Jews’ refusal to integrate with the local Christian population; being not loyal to the country they live in; for considering themselves to be the superior race than the local Christians, and for being involved in many social crimes (usury, prostitution, blood libel, etc.). As the result, Jewish communities were expelled from almost every European country, especially from England for 350 years.

    However, by the end of 19th century – the Atheist Jewish elites turned the table against their Christian oppressors – by using the ‘anti-Semite’ label as a tool to shut-up anyone who criticize Jews for their immoral activities and treason against the country they live in. The founder of the criminal cult known as Zionism – Theodor Herzl (d 1904) considered ‘anti-Semitism’ as a blessing for the Jewish people.

    With the help of western mass-media under control of Jewish lobby groups in North America and Europe – the ‘anti-Semitism’ label has been used against any political leader, intellectual or a common citizen, who find it his/her moral duty to criticize Israel’s treatment of native Muslim and Christian Palestinians. The western political leaders, especially the Americans, are so scared of pro-Israel Lobby propaganda tactics that they prefer to butter these groups rather listen to their on conscience. The common perception of a Westerner concerning ‘anti-Semitism’ could be summed-up as follow:

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to believe that Jews killed Christ.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to believe that Zionist Jews control US mass media.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to believe that Hollywood is controlled by Zionist Jews.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to believe that Jewish Lobby groups (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, etc.) controls the White House, Congress and the Senate.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to challenge Zionists’ official story of Holocaust.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to criticize Zionist-regime in occupied Palestine.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semite’ to criticize the anti-American activities of the Jewish American dual citizens, who give priority to the interests of a foreign country (Israel) over American interests.

    - It’s ‘anti-Semitism’ to believe that Israel was behind America’s occupation of Iraq and the current US vilification of Islamic regimes in Tehran and Khortoum and resistance groups like Hizb’Allah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gazzah.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  11. #11
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default The New Blood Libel

    When the Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet ran a report on Israeli organ harvesting, the Jewish dominated world media reacted in a predictable manner. As Jews often do, they are talking in different tongues to Gentile and Jewish audiences. If the media for the Gentiles did not completely ignore the article they focused on (mostly Jewish) voices protesting against the publication and demands towards the Swedish government to do something and to apologise. The media for the Tribe, on the other hand, did their best to rally the troops by drawing parallels to the infamous ‘Blood Libel’.

    Personally I find the comparison not that unfitting. Just like the centuries of accusations against Jewish communities of abductions and ritual sacrifices of Christian children by Jews as part of the annual Passover celebrations, rumours of illegal organ harvesting by Israeli doctors have been a persistent feature of the Israeli-Palestinian relations. And just like in the case of the ritual sacrifices of Christian children on Passover, the commercial slaughter of Palestinian youths for organ harvesting purpose have proven to be a fact. No Jewish grandstanding and hyperventilating can change that.

    Which brings me to the question what exactly it is that enables Jews to do such evil towards other human beings. Are those people who are committing such crimes against humanity exceptional monsters and psychopaths? I doubt it. Within their Jewish communities they are probably well liked and adjusted people, who take care of their families and contribute generously to various causes. Do psychopaths act like that? So why do they act with such lack of empathy and conscience towards non-Jews?

    The answer can be found in the traditional Jewish belief that non-Jews are not humans, but animals in human shape. Not unlike farmers and butchers who lose no sleep over the often gruesome process of producing meat, many Jews have no bad conscience when it comes to doing harm to non-Jews. They might say otherwise, but that’s only for tactical reasons. The more control they gain over a country, the more their true attitude comes out, a phenomenon that can be clearly seen in Israel and the U.S. Even those Jews who are not religious at all often show symptoms of the same kind of contempt towards non-Jews. If it’s not religion then they find other reasons such as the supposedly higher Jewish IQ and references to Jewish saint (and master plagiarist) Albert Einstein for their supremacist attitudes.

    The only surprising about the Aftonbladet story is that it got published at all. None of the Western media, including the very few that aren’t controlled (yet) by Jews, can’t afford to upset one of the many sensitivities of the Tribe. Even the most ‘anti-Semitic’ publisher won’t risk losing his advertising customers given how ruthless and experienced the various extortion rackets of the Tribe are.

    If a Swedish tabloid dared to publish such an explosive article, it means that it has higher protection from someone very powerful. That person - or group of persons - is trying to send a rather blunt message to Israel. Who in the state of Sweden has so much power that he can stand up to the Zios? Which brings me to the little known fact that Sweden is one of those countries with a privately owned central bank, the reason why it hasn’t introduced the Euro, just like Denmark and the UK. The Jewish bankster families who own those central banks are immensely powerful, thanks to their wealth and centuries of intermarriage with Europe’s old elites. (It is probably no coincidence that the very same countries are amongst the few European countries left without "hate" laws prohibiting expressions of doubt in the Holy Hoax.)

    The relationship between those families and their spoiled love child Israel has recently been strained. Thanks to the American and British troops in Iraq, Israel is no longer needed to control the strategic Middle-Eastern oil reserves. In fact is has become a liability, due to its insistence on upsetting more than a billion Muslims all around the world. The Aftonbladet article on Israeli organ harvesting is part of a concerted effort of Western elites to put pressure on the Zionist colony to come to a peaceful arrangement with the native Palestinians. The message sent out is clear: clean up your act, or (rather sooner than later) there won’t be a ‘Jewish State’.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  12. #12
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Iraq-Afghanistan: The Zionists’ “shifting stands”

    "We are now a nation that reqularly bombs civilians, detains innocent, and tortures suspects sometimes to death,” – David Swanson in ‘Daybreak’.

    “Now we have a situation where Obama is off on his own without authorization from the UN Security Council and also now illegally exceeding the authorization that had been given to Bush by Congress after 9/11 – plus he has now escalated the conflict into Pakistan and set off humanitarian catastrophe for people of Pakistan akin to what Nixon set off in Cambodia,” – Professor Francis Boyle (University of Illinois)

    “What is so vital to us in that wilderness land (Afghanistan) worth another eight years of fighting, bleeding and dying, other than averting the humiliation of another American defeat?” – Pat Buchanan

    While Obama administration showing no sign of pulling US armed forces from either Iraq or Afghanistan – some of Bush’s old pro-war Zionist thugs have started 180-degree turn – perhaps to regroup American military strength for the future Israeli confrontation with Islamic Iran.

    George F. Will is one of those warmongering Zionist turncoats. Writing for the pro-Israel Jewish-owned, The Washington Post (September 1, 2009), under the heading “Time to get out of Afghanistan”, he said: US forces are being increased by 21,000, to 68,000, bringing the coalition total to 110,000….Afghanistan would need hundreds of thousands of coalition troops, perhaps for a decade or more. That is inconceivable. So, instead, forces should be substantially reduced to serve a comprehensively revised policy. America should do what can be done from offshore, using intelligence (CIA, Mossad, RAW, and MI6 are all there), drones, cruise missiles, airstrikes and small, potent Special Forces units, concentrating on the porous 1,500-mile border with Pakistan, a nation that actually matters (being the only Muslim country with nuclear deterrent).

    On September 4, George Wills in his article in the same paper, wrote under heading “On Way Or Other, Leaving Iraq”: “After almost 6-1/2 years, and 4,327 American dead and 31,483 wounded (out of the 130,000 occupation force), with a war spiraling downward in Afghanistan, it would be indefensible for the US military….”

    The first to cry “wolf” on Will’s ’shifting sands’ was no other than another Zionist warmonger, Peter Wehner, who took his old buddy to task in his article, “Will’s Loss of Nerve” for the Jewish magazine ‘Commentary”, published on September 1, 2009, by saying: “Mr. Will’s shifting stands on these wars is vertigo-inducing. To understand just how much this is so. Will was not just in favor of the war (Iraq), he was as passionate and articulate champion of it as you could possibly find…..Will applauded bringing instability to the Middle East and countries like Egypt…. Will also predicted ‘a fairly quick end to Iraqi conflict’. However, as the war draged-on, Will came to believe the Iraq war was a grave error….”

    Joseph L. Galloway, a columnist and author, in his article for the McClatchy Newspapers, entitled Afghanistan is not worth one more American life (only one wishes Canadian government realizes that), wrote: “We have changed presidents, changed commanding generals and ambassadors, changed our tactics and changed the numbers of American boots on the ground in buildup that’s expected to reach a total of more than 70,000 US troops (plus the troops from the ZOG countries) by the end of the year. We no longer have a vital national security interest or clearly attainable goal in Afghanistan. Our stated goal is to deny any future sanctury to Al-Qaida in Afghanistan – but Al-Qaida is not based in Afghanistan and hasn’t been there for years…”

    During Iranian presidential election when Obama did not criticize Dr. Ahmadinejad’s victory (he received 62% of the total votes cast) – the Jewish Lobby took him to task and called him “a timid president” – George Will replied: “The President is roundly criticized for insufficient, rhetorical support for what’s going on over there. It seems to me foolish criticism. The people on the street know full well what the American attitude towards the regime is. And they don’t want that reinforced”.

    Most Americans approved invasion of both Afghanistan and Iraq based on the lies of the pro-Israel Jewish organizations and neo-cons holding high positions in Bill Clinton and Bush administrations. The Congress and Senate danced to the tune of the powerful Israel Lobby. Barbara Lee was the only member who opposed Bush administration’s terrorism in Afghanistan. Recently, Dennis Kucinich, was the only Congressman who opposed Obama’s war budget in Afghanistan.

    “Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Afghanistan. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home, and death and corruption in Afghanistan. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as one who loves America, to the leaders of our own nation: The great initiative in this war is ours; the initiative to stop it must be ours,” – Norman Solomon in Men with Guns, in Kabul and Washington

    Iraq war, according to some US sources, could cost taxpayers’ over 2.5 trillion dollars while Afghanistan occupation has cost American taxpayers more than US$228 billion, which could have been spent to ever-growing poverty inside the US – instead of Zionists’ greed for drugs (in Afghanistan) and oil (in Iraq and from Caspian Sea). The sooner the Americans realize the better that US state terrorism and Washington’s unquestionable support for the Zionazi state’s terrorism – creates individual and group terrorism in the Muslim world.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  13. #13
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Rehmet's World

    Israeli ‘Jihad’ against Islam

    “What is happening in Israeli Army is far more dangerous than most Israelis realize…..The morals of battlefield cannot come from a religious authority. Once it does, it’s Jihad. I know people will not like that word, but that’s what it is, Holy War. And once it’s Holy War, there are no limits,” – Gen. Nehemia Dagan, Israel Army (Reserve), Source.

    “For Israeli Jews, the support of democracy and human rights is meaningless or even harmful and deceitful when it doesn’t begin with self-critique and with support of human rights when they’re violated by one’s own group. Any support for human rights for non-Jews whose rights are being violated by the ‘Jewish state’ is as deceitful as the support for human rights by a Stanlist…” – Professor Israel Shahak (1933-2001).

    “The Land of Israel, for the people of Israel, according to Torah of Israel,” Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook, founder of Gush Emunim, the extremist Jewish settlers’ movement and first chief rabbi of Israel.

    “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail,” – Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, February 27, 1994.

    “Israel will become the Western vanguard in the war against the Islamic enemy,” – Nahum Barnea, an Israeli columnist – quoted by Israel shahak in Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March1995.

    Professor Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi (Haifa University) in his book The Israel Connection: Who Arms Israel and Why? – mentions that Israel sees Islam as the greatest danger to its dominance over the Middle East, itself built on terrorism, vioation and oppression. That is why there is always an Israeli presence in all regions where Muslims are oppressed and face extinction, from Bosnia to the Philippines, from East Turkestan to Eritrea.

    I must admit I was a bit surprised to see the Zionist-owned BBC reporting something even worse than the Swedish newspaper’s reporting of Israeli and Jewish involvement in human organ trafficking. However, I did not hear any cries of ‘anti-Semitism’ from the Israel Lobby (ADL, AJC, CJC, etc.), as it did in the Swedish case. BBC Newsnight’s Katya Adler has reported (September 7, 2009) – the rise of rabbis in Israeli military (BBC video) – who are teaching Israeli Occupation Force (IOF) soldiers hatred toward Arabs and Muslims. The news could be a surprise to the majority of the westerners, but people who have read professor Israel Shahak’s (1933-2001) famous book Jewish History, Jewish Religion would know that the Talmudic race is raised on hatred towards non-Jews and especially the Christianity. However, the Zionists have replaced Christians with Muslims since they occupied Arab Palestine. According to the author: “While Islamic fundamentalism is vilified in the West, comparable Jewish extremism is largely ignored”.

    Stephen Lendman posted an article entitled Religious Extremism in Israel on his blog in which he wrote: “Gush Emunim adherents and other Israeli religious zealots are active in politics, hold seats in Knesset, are in Netanyahu coalition government partners, and are prominently represented in Israel’s military throughout the ranks and rabbinate. Chief military rabbi, Brigadier General Avichai Rontzki, called Operation Cast Lead a “religious war” in which it was “immoral” to show mercy to an enemies of “murders (1.5 million people of Gazzah)”.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  14. #14
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default From Boycott to wrapping in Israeli flag

    Lately, the greatest media coverage given to any single community or country, by the world media, has been Jews and Israel – so much so, that one could think that Jews form world’s largest population – more than Christians (1.9 billion), Muslims (1.7 billion), and Hindus (800 millions). Some of the great ‘anti-Semitic’ news have been - South African Dockworkers\’ boycott of Israeli ships or NY rabbis arrested for human organ trafficking or Israeli forces stealing organs from dead and alive Palestinian prisoners or Jimmy Carter\’s idea of converting 5,000-year-old Palestine in Israel or Norway celebrating the 150th birthday of Knut Hamsun, or Oliver Stone’s unsuccessful project to make a movie on Iranian president Dr. Ahmadinejad (Ahmadinejad has refused the offer) or Canadian filmmaker, John Greyson’s boycott of Toronto International Film Festival for management’s pro-Israel publicity agenda, and so on.

    However, to the great pleasure of the ‘Israel-First’ Jewish groups (AIPAC, ADL, AJC, B’inai B’rith, CJC, etc.) – Queen Madonna Esther appeared on stage half-naked and wrapped in Israeli flag during her last week concert in Tel Aviv. Just imagine, what would be the reaction of Abe Foxman, had Yusuf Islam attended a concert in Beirut, doning Hizb’Allah flag! Allegedly, despite intense lobbying by Abe Foxman-AIPAC, the Kennedy family graciously declined to wrap Ted Kennedy’s coffin in an American-Israeli flag. Shimon Pere, Bibi, and the leaders of AIPAC, ADL and AJC – all praised Ted Kennedy as great friend of Israel (something Jimmy Carter, though serving Israel during his presidence, will never get now).

    Franklin Lamb in his September 8 article, A Bum Wrap – Burying Ted Kennedy with the Israeli flag wrote:

    “Israel foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, praised Kennedy as “a great friend to me and to Israel and to the Jewish people. He was one of ours.” The anti-Palestinian American Jewish Committee executive director David Harris added that ”Kennedy was in his hearts of heart an Israeli who could always be relied upon. His support for the well-being of the state of Israel faced with Arab threats, was always firm, as was his solidarity with vulnerable Jewish communities.” Harris noted, Kennedy was kind of like ”Joe Biden the Zionist” Harris would have us believe.

    Kennedy was not unaware that Israel turned Gaza into a Ghetto and that 90% of casualties in “Cast Lead” were civilians. Or that Israel steals Palestinian lands – steal water resources – burns olive trees and other crops – creates an apartheid wall on stlen land – imprisons nearly 12,000 people, many without trial – indiscriminately uses of US-provided F16s – kills thousands of civilians mostly women and children – commits assassinations at will – starves an entire nation and complains that the opressed Palestinians fire misguided missiles in revenge.

    Some Kennedy staffers claim to have seen a change in Ted’s views (Ted’s blind support for the Zionist entity) following his 1992 marriage to Victoria Araiji Boustany Reggie, whose family on her mother side is Lebanese. Probably Ted learned a lot about Israel’s attack on Lebanon from her. A number of Boustanys in Lebanon actually support Hizbollah and the Resistance….”

    Personally, I am not admirer of any of America’s top politicians – but I must give credit to Ted Kenndy – for being smart enough not to make enemies those people who were most probably behind the murders of his elder brothers.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  15. #15
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Jewish Conference on Islamic Iran

    On September 10 – More than 300 Jewish community leaders converged on Washington DC to attend the ‘National Jewish Leadership Advocacy Day on Iran’ Conference – in support of Benjamin Netanyahu’s call for crippling sanctions against Islamic regime in Tehran. Laura Rozen on her ‘Politico’ blog reported that the ‘Israel-First’ communal leaders were addressed by Obama’s Middle East strategist, Dennis Ross (a Zionist Jew), in Washington’s Synogogue before their march onto Capitol Hill – to receive more assurances from America’s pro-Israel political leaders against Iran. Obama’s Under Secretary of States for Political affairs, William Burns (a Zionist Jew). Both told the conference that Obama administration is committed to Israeli desire not to let Iran become a nuclear power – and that it is planning to put-in-place more strict sanctions against Tehran by the end of September and revist further by the end of the year.

    The list of other speakers at the conference to comfort the paranoid Jewish leaders included House Foreign Affair Committee Chairman, Howard Berman (a zionist Jew), read his address here, House Minority Leader, John Boehner, and Minority Whip, Eric Cantor.

    In April 2009 – AIPAC puppet, Senators Evan Bayh, Joseph Leiberman, and Jon Kyl introduced a major new Iran sanction, which was co-signed by 20 other Senators from both Democrat and Republican parties. In the Congress, Brand Sherman and Mark Kirk introduced anti-Iran resolution which is modelled on the bill drafted by Barack Hussein Obama as a Senator!

    In April 2009, speaking to the members of pro-Israel media watch-dog CAMERA in New York, Joseph Leiberman, had warned that “the aquisition of nuclear weapon by Iran would pose a serious threat to Israel and Arab nations (notice the honest Zionist Jew did not mention “United States”) and bolster the Islamic Republic’s efforts to threaten Israel and Arab regimes,” (JTA, April 27, 2009).

    And let us not ignore the Mossad agent and now president Nicolas Sarkozy, who in June 2008 put his two-cents worth of his French Jewishness (his mother is a Spanish Jew) to the great applause from the Zionist terrorists in the Knesset : “I reiterate here in the clearest manner. As far as France is concerned, a nuclear Iran is totally unacceptable. France is dtermined to continue to lead, along with its partners, a policy that integrates gradually intensifying sanctions with openness, in case Iran choose to honour its international obligations”.

    The most balanced opinion on the US-Itan conflict, I have read recently, comes from a former US Assistant Secretary of Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts – who wrote: “Iran is developing nuclear energy, which is its right as a signatory to NPT. Iran’s nuclear program is subject to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which consistently reports that its inspections find no diversion of enriched uranium to a weapon program. The position taken by Israel, and by Israel’s puppet in Washington, is that Iran must not be allowed to have the rights as a signatory to NPT (Israel refuses to sign NPT) that every other signatory has, because Iran might divert enriched uranium to a weapon program. In other word, Israel and the US claim the right to abrogate Iran’s right to develop nuclear energy. The Israel-US position has no basis in international law or anything other than the arrogance of Israel and the United States…”

    Dr. Elias Akleh, in his recent article titled US-Israel vs Iran Nuclear Chess Game, wrote: “Israeli leaders are crying wolf everywhere they go. Distorting Ahmadinejad’s speeches they declared him the new Hitler, who wants to wipe Israel off the map. They accused Iran of sponsoring terror by arming Hezbollah and Hamas. They keep claiming that Iran is only few months away from building its first nuclear bomb and such a weapon in the hands of the mad Mullahs is an existential threat to Israel. Such a threat, they keep claiming, endangers the whole region including the oil producing Gulf States, and could expand to endanger the rest of the world.

    Israelis know very well that they cannot strike Iran. They fully recognize that decisions concerning the Iranian issue are exclusively American due to Iran’s strength and geopolitical importance in the region. Iran is a large and a strong military country. Economic sanctions did nothing but helped Iranian rely on their own resources. The threats of possible attacks forced the Iranians to strengthen their military forces. Netanyahu’s “Iran first”, “Israel’s existential threat”, and “striking Iran” messages are directed towards the international political community first and towards the Israeli population second.

    With the convening of the UN General Assembly this September, Netanyahu is trying to divert and engage the Assembly’s attention into the alleged Iranian nuclear threat. He hopes that such diversion would not give the Assembly enough time to discuss Israel’s war crimes and human rights violations in Palestine and especially in Gaza Strip as reported by Human Rights Watch groups. Netanyahu’s “Iran first” message is also meant to freeze re-opening any peace negotiations with the Palestinians and to escape American and European pressure to suspend colonial settlements in the West Bank.

    Internally Netanyahu, like all previous Israeli Prime Ministers, is manipulating the media to bombard the Israeli population with a propaganda campaign filled with the images of the monstrosity of the enemy (Israel’s existential threat) to incite the feelings of fear and hatred of others and of elitecism (God’s chosen people) to unite and to rally the Israelis behind his leadership….The US has firm footings in the Gulf States, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union it started expanding in South East Asia starting with Afghanistan, jumping to Iraq then back into Pakistan. Now Iran is left in between as a gab in the US continuum presence….”

    Islamic Iran is home to the largest Jewish community (30,000) in the Middle East after the Zionist entity. In 2007, Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein’s the so-called “charity organization”, the ‘International Fellowship of Christians and Jews’ that funnels millions of dollars in evangelical donation to the Zionist entity every year – promised US$10,000 to every Iranian Jew who comes to Israel. This is in addition to the stipend they would automatcally receive from the Jewish Agency under their ‘right of return’ (a land where their ancestors never lived in Palestine). Interestingly, only a few dozens Iranians accepted ‘the generous’ offer. Iranian Jews, like Catholics, Protestants and Parsees – have one seat reserved for them in the Majlis (Parliament) and all religious laws concerning minorites – are established by consultation with their representatives.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  16. #16
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default TIFF ‘protest’ irks Israel Lobby

    “In Canada today, to criticize Israel is a very dangerous thing,” – Kathy Wazana, Canadian Jewish filmaker.

    “The petition protesting TIFF decision to feature a celebratory ’spotlight’ on Tel Aviv - is based on the understanding that by doing this the festival has become, whether knowing or not, a participant in a cynical PR campaign to improve Israel’s image, make her less war-like. The Israeli Consul General said a year ago that Toronto would be the launch site of an extensive “Brand Israel” campain,” – Actress Jane Fonda.

    In case someone like to find out how the Zionist thugs mistranslated Ahmadinejad’s statement Wipe Out Israel Off The Map to serve their evil propaganda – should see the current protest against the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) for showing 10 Israeli films glorifying Tel Aviv city’s 100th anniversary - being projected as Boycott by the Israeli Lobby. Tel Aviv is also known as The Pink City. The city was not only built on the land stolen by European Jews from native Muslim and Christian Palestinians – but also prides itself being the home to 250 brothels – according to Marion Marrache (Jerusalem Post, August 31, 2001).

    More than 65 Jewish and Christian artists, academics, and filmakers – who signed the Toronto Declaration: No Celebration of Occupation - have called the event - “The Israeli propaganda machine.” The ten-day, 34th edition of ‘City to City’ festival, kicked-off on September 11. The signatories include John Greyson, Jane Fonda, Wallace Shawn, Danny Glover, David Byrne, Ken Loach, Eve Ensler, Harry Belfonte, Viggo Mortensen, Udi Aloni, Naomi Klein and Howard Zinn.

    Zionist Rabbi Marwin Heir of Simon Weisenthal Center has blasted everyone who signed the declaration saying: “People who support letters like this are people who don’t support two-state solution. By calling into question the legitimacy of Tel Aviv, they are supporting a one-state solution, which means the destruction of State of Israel.”

    Israel-born Canadian documentary filmaker, Simcha Jacobovici suggested to John Greyson to find Israeli vs Palestinian tolerance – by screening his short film about Sarajevo Queer Festival (about gays) in Tel Aviv and the West Bank – indirectly meaning that while Israeli Jews are tolerant toward gays – the Muslims in the West Bank would not.

    Robert Lantos writing for the anti-Islam Can-West daily, The National Post (September 11, 2009) called Noami Klein a “professional agitator and a liar”. Interestingly, he challenged Noami by saying: “There was no such thing as Palestine prior to 1948″. However, he did add: “When city of Tel Aviv was founded in 1909, it was a Turkish colony, later a British colony, and once upon a time a Roman colony.” I wonder why the idiot missed the period between 7th to 17th century when Palestine was “colonized” by Muslim Arabs including over 100 years by the European Christian Franks – who butchered Jerusalem’s entire Muslim population of 65,000 and Jewish population of 5,000!!

    City of Tel Aviv was established by European Jewish immigrant on September 11, 1909. The name Tel Aviv was taken from Theodor Herzl’s 1902 novel Altneuland in Hebrew. Originally design by Zionist Jewish elites as a garden suburb of the rapidly expanding Arab town of Jaffa. It was established as a preeminent symbol of the future Jewish demographic state of Israel.

    The city, according to Zionist poetry, literary and academic propaganda - was “Born out of Sand” with no Arab living around. However, the truth is that Tel Aviv though established on a sandy region near the shore – was part of a complex ecosystem that included citrus orchards and farms, Jafa and its famous port, mills, Bedouin encampments, and SIX Palestinian villages. the remnants of one village, Summel, are still visible along Ibn Girol Street. The city layout was designed by Scottish urban planner, Patric Geddes, in 1925.

    Tel Aviv is a living example of Zionists’ Talmudic racism against non-Jewish Arab natives. In 1940 the mayor of all-Jewish Tel aviv threatened the British District Commissioner that he would “blow up with bombs” a new market opened on the mutual border with Palestinian-majority Jaffa – because it would lead to greater movement of goods and people back and forth.

    After the 1948 ‘Occupation War’ – only 5,000 of Jaffa’s 70,000 Arabs stayed put. The Arab exodus pleased David Ben Gurion, who declared: “Jaffa will be a Jewish city…War is war”. In 1950, Jaffa was annexed to Tel Aviv.

    SOURCE
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  17. #17
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Dutch to prosecute Arab cartoonist



    Dutch prosecutors said Wednesday they will charge an Arab cultural group under hate speech laws for publishing a cartoon that suggests the death of 6 million Jews during World War II is a fabrication.

    The public prosecutor's office in the city of Utrecht said the cartoon insults Jews as a group and is therefore an illegal form of discrimination.
    Prosecutors plan to press charges for "insulting a group and distributing an insulting image."

    Spokeswoman Mary Hallebeek said the maximum punishment is a year in jail, but a fine of up to euro4,700 ($6,700) is more likely, given that the charges are against the group.

    The Dutch arm of the Arab European League said it doesn't deny the reality of the Holocaust, but published the cartoon on its Web site as an "act of civil disobedience" to highlight a double standard.


    AEL chairman Abdoulmouthalib Bouzerda argued that prosecutors had not pressed charges against Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders for his film that included cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

    Charges against Wilders, who campaigns on an anti-Islam and anti-immigration platform, were dismissed after prosecutors said his insults were aimed at Muhammad, not all Muslims, and were not systematic.

    The charges against the AEL "illustrates what Muslims have been saying for decades," Bouzerda said in a response published on the league's Web site. "Freedom of expression is only a pretext to make life bitter for Muslims ... and if (they) try to bring this hypocrisy to light, that right is denied them."

    Bouzerda said anyone should be allowed to publish insulting material in the interest of public debate.

    The cartoon shows two apparently Jewish men standing near a pile of skeletons with a sign that says "Auswitch," presumably representing the largest Nazi concentration camp, Auschwitz.

    One pokes a bone with a stick and says "I don't think they're Jews" and the other answers, "We have to get to the six million somehow."

    Ronny Naftaniel of the Center for Documentation on Israel, which filed a complaint against the cartoon, said Jews had nothing to do with the Muhammad cartoons, so it didn't make sense for the league to retaliate in this way.

    "Imagine if Dutch Jews insulted Muslims every time they heard an anti-Semitic remark. What kind of perverse world would we be living in?" he said.

    After a strong immigration wave in the 1990s, Muslims make up around 6 percent of the 16.5 million Dutch population.

    A popular backlash against immigration has dominated politics here since 2001, and it intensified in 2004, when filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered by a Muslim radical over perceived religious insults.

    That further fueled debate over immigrant crime and the need to preserve traditional Dutch values.
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  18. #18
    Administrator Array
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    21° 30' N, 39° 10' E
    Posts
    4,551

    Default

    I thought that the Dutch would fight tooth and nail to defend a cartoonist's right to free speech?

  19. #19
    Truth Spreader Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    Only if had been insulting to Muslims and the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

    Dutch MP Wilders of Fitna fame has been acquited - because according to the prosecutors - he "insulted Muhammad and not the Muslims".
    It’s immoral and wrong to demand from the victims not to resist the oppressors

  20. #20
    islamirama.wordpress.com Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    9,669

    Default

    What can you expect from the hypocrites except prejudice and double standards...


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •